[fortheDeclaration]

Amen to your post.

The question of origins is largely a matter of history—not the domain of applied science. Contrary to the unilateral denials of many evolutionists, one’s worldview does indeed play heavily on one’s interpretation of scientific data, a phenomenon that is magnified in matters concerning origins, where neither repeatability, nor observation, nor measurement—the three immutable elements of the scientific method—may be employed. Many proponents of evolutionism nevertheless persist in claiming exclusive “scientific” status for their popularized beliefs, while curtly dismissing (if not angrily deriding) all doubters, and spurning Darwin’s advice. http://www.trueorigins.org/

[King Prout]

where neither repeatability, nor observation, nor measurement—the three immutable elements of the scientific method—may be employed

false statement.