Posted on 09/28/2005 4:43:58 PM PDT by SmithL
SACRAMENTO -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Wednesday signed legislation that requires public schools to give more information about where their money is going and gives county superintendents more oversight of charter schools.
___
SCHOOL SPENDING: California schools will now have to report the average per-pupil spending and teachers' salaries at individual schools in the annual accountability reports they are required to give parents and the state.
The change should shed light on the inequities in spending within school districts, such as whether some schools have more qualified teachers than others, said Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, who introduced the bill, SB687. Previously, districts only had to report districtwide averages.
"I think this measure will force some difficult conversations in districts around the state. I think they are conversations we need to have," Simitian said Wednesday.
A report earlier this month by the public policy research group Education Trust-West found that schools with higher numbers of poor and racial minority students have teachers who earn less and are generally less experienced than their counterparts at more affluent schools even within the same district.
State law requires schools to post annual school accountability report cards listing everything from test scores to building maintenance.
___
CHARTER SCHOOLS: Charter schools will have more oversight from county superintendents under SB430, which the governor signed Wednesday. . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
A FEW??? Lady, you are totally misinformed. This list took me less than ten minutes to put together.
In Massachusetts Nearly 60 percent of the 2,000 prospective teachers failed the test. But the state Board of Education, with backing from Mr. Haydu, voted last week to lower the passing grade, reducing the number who failed to 44 percent. . BTW, 63% of math teachers failed the math test.
Over 90% of all teachers are certified to teach. The test data proves that certification accomplishes NOTHING.
I would not want someone teaching my children who had not been through the proper educational program and passed with decent grades.
Proper according to whom?
As to accomplishment and home education, I don't expect public schools to deliver what my kids learn. They both started college level work before they were twelve. It isn't that hard.
No, you proved that you are incapable of analyzing the data. If 90% of teachers are accredited and over half fail tests they give their own students, the accreditation means nothing.
My daughter is certified to teach K-6. She takes continuing education courses and is working towards her masters degree. She graduated with honors.
From what I have seen of graduate teacher education, that doesn't impress. My mother was a teacher with two masters' degrees BTW, and in her latter years should have been fired for incompetence.
I don't know about your state, but in Virginia children who are home schooled receive the lesson plans from the STATE (prepared by teachers) and their tests, etc. have to be sent to the STATE to be graded and their progress noted by TEACHERS!
HSLDA will fix that eventually. A range of educational curricula that exceed the standards of any public school are available online. Most states do not (and should not) attempt to control a home curriculum. The students do better than their peers anyway.
I am glad that your children are doing so well. You must be doing a good job. However, thank a TEACHER for your ability to do this!!!
Equine feces. According to you, I couldn't be doing a good job because I am not trained to do it. As it is, I spend less time teaching my kids now than I did when they were going to school, in part because I don't have to deal with the problems the school induced. I spent a good part of the first two years of home schooling my younger daughter UNDOING THE DAMAGE done by a private school implementing some modern wack-job theory of learning how to write (one of the reasons we started teaching them at home). I didn't have to teach my older daughter calculus (although I am qualified to do so); she did it herself and was recommended for college level physics by a university professor simply by presenting her work. She was twelve at the time. From that you should get a clue regarding what home education is all about: It is not taught; it is learned.
My kids also study material I never had the opportunity to read: Tacitus, Cicero, Plutarch, Julius Caesar, Homer, Herodotus... It would be impossible for me to "teach" them that information. Instead, I (mercilessly) criticize their writing derived from that material and make certain that they can support a reasoned argument with citations. Thus, I could not be "certified" to teach the material, but they are getting a great education.
Because some places are ALL charter schools. Like Pacific Palisades, Arnie's hometown. It's the wealthy area dodge to get out from under the LAUSD thumb and secure bennies for the local area.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.