LOL...we BOTH got beat by mere seconds...well anyhoo, here's the HAMMER!He was at the fundraisers and they used his name and he was on an advisory committee - - - but he didn't know what they were doing. Tom, you better get a better story and quick!
There really seems to be something wrong with him the last month or so doesn't there? We better run a DNA check and make sure this really is "the Hammer".
LOL...we BOTH got beat by mere seconds...well anyhoo, here's the HAMMER!He said under Texas law you could raise corporate funds for services....excess monies sent by the PAC to Republican State Committee...says that's the way it works...."corporate money cannot come back to Texas."
DeLay pointed out that Earle and the Democrats have been trying to do this for ten years. Said what he did at the time was legal and that's what the indictment is based on.
DeLay has a good explanation for every objection Britt is raising.
DeLay is going on the offensive, and that's good. Perhaps Dick DeGuerin, DeLay's lawyer, will push Earle into dropping the case. Earle cannot go back to the grand jury, as they are dismissed.
This is the same ridiculous argument they used with Bush about having to know every single detail on everything!
BS! Leaders DELEGATE!!
It seems Delay is explaining what happened clearly enough.