Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Claims Kid's Bedtime Story Book Contains...Nudity?!
Yahoo News ^ | 9/27/05

Posted on 09/28/2005 2:38:08 PM PDT by shining_city

Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) September 27, 2005 -- Liberals on the airwaves and across the Internet have assailed the bestselling new conservative children's book "Help! Mom! There Are Liberals Under My Bed" (Kids Ahead; hardcover $15.95; ISBN 0976726904) since it was announced several weeks ago, but the criticism took a surprising turn on Monday when prominent liberal Andrew Sullivan waded into the controversy, this according to the book's publisher.

Sullivan — the author of multiple books and a former editor for the magazine "New Republic" — claimed on his popular blog that the book contains nudity, a charge which set off fierce debate across the blogosphere that ultimately resulted in Sullivan issuing a retraction. The allegation nonetheless came as a shock to many and prompted concerned inquiries directed to both the author and the publisher. The book, which contains full-color illustrations, tells the story of liberals taxing and regulating a lemonade stand and features cartoon look-alikes of liberal icons Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy. It is currently ranked #3 in the category of children's bestsellers on Amazon.com.

"How can you tell when a political ideology has become the equivalent of a religion?" Sullivan wrote on his blog. "When it attempts to indoctinate 4 – 8 year olds." He went on to instruct readers to "check out some of the illustrations" and provided a link to a website which hosted fabricated images purporting to be from the book. One of the images on the page Sullivan linked to featured cartoon nudity and showed a caricature identified as Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) clad in inappropriate pants.

"National Review" commentators Jonah Goldberg and John Podhoretz criticized Sullivan for his attack, prompting Sullivan to later acknowledge that he had realized that the illustrations were "fakes and parodies." But no sooner had he delivered his mea culpa than the he resumed his attack on "Help! Mom! There Are Liberals Under My Bed," saying it was "ideological fanaticism" that invoked memories of Chinese dictator Chairman Mao Tse-Tung.

Sullivan is just the latest high profile liberal to criticize author Katharine DeBrecht and her popular book. Alan Colmes, co-host of Fox"s Hannity & Colmes, called the book "brainwashing." MSNBC host Ron Reagan mused that he should write his own kid's book depicting conservatives as "hat[ing] black people." The Democratic Underground website listed DeBrecht on their "Top 10 Conservative Idiots" list and was the source for the phony picture that Sullivan claimed was real. And Daily Kos, the most trafficked left-wing blog, likened the book to Nazi propaganda.

"I'm disappointed in Andrew Sullivan, but I'm not surprised," said DeBrecht, a mother of three. "Left-wing books have been pouring into our classrooms and libraries for a long time. Now liberals are incensed to see a book supporting traditional values come along, sell well, and have a little fun in the process." DeBrecht added that children's books advocating socialism ("Rainbow Fish"), homosexuality ("King & King" and "Daddy's Roommate"), and Bush-bashing ("No, George, No!") have long been in circulation.

"Is being compared to Chairman Mao a compliment coming from a liberal?" quipped DeBrecht. "Last week the liberals were calling me a Nazi, so I'll take this as a sign of progress."


About Kids Ahead:
Kids Ahead is an imprint of Los Angeles-based World Ahead Publishing, the West Coast's premier publisher of conservative and libertarian books. To learn more, visit www.worldahead.com.

Contact Information:
To interview author Katharine DeBrecht, contact Special Guests at (630) 848-0750.

# # #


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: alancolmes; andrewsullivan; barneyfrank; helpmom; hillaryclinton; johnpodhoretz; jonahgoldberg; katharinedebrecht; liberalsunderbed; nationalreview; newrepublic; ronreagan; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
"Is being compared to Chairman Mao a compliment coming from a liberal?"

The answer, I think, is yes.

1 posted on 09/28/2005 2:38:14 PM PDT by shining_city
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shining_city

Since when do liberals care about nudity and children?


2 posted on 09/28/2005 2:42:18 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (I am conservative. That is NOT the same thing as Republican. Don't place party over principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shining_city
Neither one of Heather's two mommies will allow their daughter to be propagandized by this right wing book.
3 posted on 09/28/2005 2:42:39 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (We need a strict constructionist - not someone who plays shadow puppet theater with the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shining_city
"Is being compared to Chairman Mao a compliment coming from a liberal?" quipped DeBrecht. "Last week the liberals were calling me a Nazi, so I'll take this as a sign of progress."

Going from murdering 13 million to murdering >60 million is certainly a step up for liberals.

4 posted on 09/28/2005 2:42:48 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shining_city

"....Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) clad in inappropriate pants."

How is this possible?


5 posted on 09/28/2005 2:43:07 PM PDT by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shining_city
Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) clad in inappropriate pants.

Don't want to know. Not going to Google for the picture. Please don't post it.

6 posted on 09/28/2005 2:43:50 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (We need a strict constructionist - not someone who plays shadow puppet theater with the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M1911A1
In other words what, exactly, would be appropriate pants?
7 posted on 09/28/2005 2:45:39 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shining_city

hehehe!


8 posted on 09/28/2005 2:48:14 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
Exactly...and what is it that makes those pants inappropriate for him, and not somebody else?

Journalists are so...imprecise.
9 posted on 09/28/2005 2:48:29 PM PDT by M1911A1 (clad in inappropriate pants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy

"Since when do liberals care about nudity and children?"

Liberals are only upset when the nude Children are not performaing homosexual acts.


10 posted on 09/28/2005 2:48:38 PM PDT by Patti_ORiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shining_city

He's aligned himself with the sicko Dan Savage, which should tell anyone all they need to know about where Sullivan's thoughts lie.


11 posted on 09/28/2005 2:49:47 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shining_city
"How can you tell when a political ideology has become the equivalent of a religion?" Sullivan wrote on his blog. "When it attempts to indoctinate 4 – 8 year olds."




Now ..........it is pretty clear that they recognize their own actions in public schools, as indoctrination, no matter what they call it!! Tolerance and diversity, all in the name of safe schools?? I think not, this man just labeled it for us, as if we didn't know!

For the record, DeBrecht's book may "teach" kids the values of capitalism. and conservatism, but it does not indoctrinate anything. Nor does it destroy the Psyche and emotional stability of little children.
12 posted on 09/28/2005 2:50:51 PM PDT by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shining_city; Calpernia

New book promotes sex with children
WorldNetDaily ^

Posted on 09/18/2005 10:38:36 PM PDT by scripter

A new book published by Haworth Press features multiple Ph.D. "experts" claiming that sex with children "can benefit" boys and even serve a "mentoring function."

"Same-Sex Desire and Love in Greco-Roman Antiquity and in the Classical Tradition of the West" features "scholarly" treatises by a raft of mostly-PhD academics, all praising earlier civilizations – particularly Greece and Rome – for the role homosexuality played in those ancient cultures.

In the chapter titled "Pederasty: An Integration of Cross-Cultural, Cross-Species, and Empirical Data," Bruce Rind Ph.D. lauds the rampant child molestation that reportedly occurred in those societies, at one point citing evolution as supporting a pro-pedophilia worldview.....



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1487154/posts


13 posted on 09/28/2005 2:51:01 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Didn't the publisher pull out of the deal with that book?


14 posted on 09/28/2005 2:53:02 PM PDT by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: shining_city
prominent liberal Andrew Sullivan

At least he is being correctly labeled as a liberal. Usually they do what the Globe did several weeks back, call him a conservative and then promote some stock talking point of the gay activist agenda assuming that the conservative label gives Sullivan credibility.

15 posted on 09/28/2005 2:54:44 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
Going from murdering 13 million to murdering >60 million is certainly a step up for liberals.

Good point, coloradan. That's approaching Roe v. Wade territory.

Btw, if you visit Sullivan's blog, he's been pretty quiet on this issue since it blew up in his face. No surprise there.
16 posted on 09/28/2005 3:03:58 PM PDT by shining_city
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: M1911A1

A hole in the seat???


17 posted on 09/28/2005 3:04:20 PM PDT by Triggerhippie (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie

In my case, inappropriate pants would mean no room for a strong side inside-the-pants holster and matching mag pouch.

In Barney's case....I just can't see how anything could be inappropriate.


18 posted on 09/28/2005 3:11:20 PM PDT by M1911A1 (clad in inappropriate pants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: shining_city

Hit dog yelps the loudest.


19 posted on 09/28/2005 3:13:51 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Here is a link to the Democractic Underground Top 10 Conservative Idiots list that was the source of the pictures. Scroll down to the bottom. They are clearly parodies.

(Don't worry, KarlInOhio, I won't post the pictures here.)
20 posted on 09/28/2005 3:14:46 PM PDT by shining_city
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson