Agreed!!
I tend to agree but how do you know that all are "guys" who are posting?
ditto - but here is criticism of Robin Rather that is appropriate: it's pretty certain she was mixed up in the bungled hit-job on Bush last fall. She had to know the lies behind what she was leading her dad into, but she let her blind hatred of Republicans and her lack of integrity overrule her responsibilty to her dad. The result was, daddy Dan Rather deep-sixed his career in the worst way imaginable. She is a horrible excuse for a daughter.
Okay. Robin Rather "looks" like a partisan political dirty trick operative for the Democrat Party. A James Car-vile with hair. A Dan Rather with an double X chromosome. A Craig Livingston minus the giant cigarette costume. A Mapes 60 Minutes secret source, complete with Kinko's fax number. That's what she "looks" like to me.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Ronnie Earl has Dan Rather connections!!, Fred911 wrote:
"I love this forum and am embarrassed by the attacks on Rather's daughter. Really guys, it is beneath you to attack her and ridicule her physical appearance.
Don't get me wrong, I hate Dan Rather and was sickened by his interview the other night. He is an imbecile.
But we should stick to criticizing people on their actions...not their looks. "
I agree... Just because she looks like the practice dummy for the prototype of the ugly stick, doesn't mean it's a reason to attack her. Especially, since the fact that she supports a POS like Rancid Ronnie, her looks is one of her redeeming qualities.
>>
But we should stick to criticizing people on their actions...not their looks.
<<
Sure thing, pizza-face. ;^)
You are right, though -- that kind of thing is demoRAT bread-and-butter.
Ditto