Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mewzilla
The excrement with NO and LA must be pretty bad for the Dems to trot this out now. I'd figured on them waiting a while.

I knew Earle would do it. I just thought he wouldn't do it until early next year.

But you can be certain that this was coordinated with the DNC, and they chose this timing. Maybe it's because of the Supreme Court openings. Maybe it's because of Blanco and Nagin.

I don't know.

But if you read the text of the actual indictment, it's just a bald assertion that DeLay entered into an agreement to skirt campaign finance laws. There's nothing at all alleged fact-wise to back that up. No dates, no conversations, no nothing.

588 posted on 09/28/2005 10:55:58 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
You say you have read the indictment.

Can you post a link?

600 posted on 09/28/2005 10:58:48 AM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone

And from what Napolitano on FNC was saying, TX has some pretty interesting rules when it comes to seating grand juries. Don't get me wrong, if DeLay did this and it's proven in court, then throw the book at him. But if DeLay's the victim of a political witchhunt, then Earle ought to be brought up on charges or at least disbarred.


603 posted on 09/28/2005 10:59:03 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson