Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: anymouse
..."Had the decision been mine, we would not have built the space station we're building in the orbit we're building it in."...

The agreement on the orbit inclination was an appeasment to the Russians.

That orbit has cost us millions (and perhaps 7 astronauts) in upgrades to the shuttle components.

In order to reach that orbit the SSME's have to run at 105% (IIRC), the ET had to be redesigned to be lighter (which may have contributed to the Columbia disaster)and the SRB's had to have modifications done.

10 posted on 09/28/2005 9:11:24 AM PDT by FReepaholic (I don't look good naked anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tscislaw
That orbit has cost us millions (and perhaps 7 astronauts)

Wrong. Changing the composition of the foam to appease the greenies cost the 7 astronauts.

40 posted on 09/28/2005 9:35:30 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: tscislaw
From what I understand, the Columbia was using one of the older style external tanks that was a bit heavier, which was part of why it was in a lower orbit and couldn't reach the space station. They figured that a lower orbit science mission would be a good use of a tank they couldn't use to service the space station.
53 posted on 09/28/2005 10:03:03 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson