Replies

Exactly, it isn't one or the other, its lets look at all possibilities. This doesn't exclude either or give preference to either while allowing everyone to make their own conclusions. This shouldn't be taught as a class of what is but taught as a class of what if. Students would be required to access what they have be theorized and give written conclusions. Students would still be required to understand the known universe such as planets, comets, exploration, etc.

Well said, and thank you, TheForceofOne! Especially your sentence, "This shouldn't be taught as a class of "what is", but taught as a class of "what if"." Sorry for the added punctuation....that's just ME. LOL The Liberal agenda is all about "what floats your boat". But they are sneaky that way. They ARE biased, and they do NOT believe in open discussion and open debate unless it serves their "cause". And to be blatantly honest, their "cause" is bad, very bad.....evil, bad.....'nuf said.

What they're not being taught at our places of higher learning is to use your mind, everything has been discussed and prepared in a Liberal think tank then regurgitated onto the minds of young students.

Diversity in the cultural sense is celebrated, not independent thought in college these days.

I posted a couple of articles the last few days you may find interesting.

Ivory Cower (University presidents have lost their dignity)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1492515/posts

The Left University (How it was born; how it grew; how to overcome it.)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1491457/posts