Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
I'm forced to wonder if this would have been considered a puzzle worth examining if it hadn't been for the likes of Behe and Dembski pointing out the (then-existing) gap in the theory and making an issue out of it.

No, Darwin was aware of irreducible complexity and acknowledged the need to address it continually. The full case for irreducible complexity was made in 1802 by Paley in "Natural Theology". Origin of Species was a response to Paley.

150 posted on 09/29/2005 12:16:50 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
No, Darwin was aware of irreducible complexity and acknowledged the need to address it continually.

That was well before his theory became accepted by the scientific community as a bedrock tenet of biology. I'm talking about since then.

153 posted on 09/29/2005 12:28:51 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson