Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rio
That is a wise move, and any decent publicist or attorney would advise it.

Actually, this sort of "no comment" clause in a settlement agreement is fairly common, especially when the case involves a business that deals with the public. The only unusual thing here is that these are tipsters rather than plaintiffs.

But the reasoning behind the agreement is still good. It is a fair exchange for a substantial amount of money. If they feel they can do better selling their story to the news shows, they can forgo the bird in the hand and say whatever they want.

2 posted on 09/28/2005 7:19:23 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother

"If they feel they can do better by selling their story to the news shows, they can forgo the bird in the hand and say whatever they want"

Agreed. Money is the root of all evil. What happen to being a good citizen. That was a quick $50,000 for the guy, probably more than he made in one year. That 15 minute of fames and greed seems to go to everybody's head. They go on endless talk shows re-telling the story.

Had they reported incident to police or Wendy's company maybe company would not have suffered as much and he could have gone on every talk show.


3 posted on 09/28/2005 7:52:50 AM PDT by newfrpr04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson