[jihadjim]

Evolution is a religion just as any others. Applying mathematical probability of natural selection to EVERY species on the planet, including plants, animals, sea creatures, and insects for each have evolved from a single cell has a probability of zero taking even the most extreme estimate of the earths age into consideration. Then having to start nearly from scratch after the demise of the dinosaurs. Now THAT is taking something on faith. Indoctrinating young minds on such nonsense is not science -- its a cult. The fact of the matter is we don't know and until we do all THEORIES should be taught. Hell when I was a kid in early 70's we were being told of the coming Ice Age by the parents of these same psuedo-intellectual 'scientists'. Now its global warming - hey I got an idea maybe its the fricken Sun. By the way what caused all the global warming the eliminated the first Ice Age? Caveman cooking Bronto burgers?

Of course then there is that sticky problem of when time began and where did all that matter come from that was involved in the big bang.

As bug bunny says 'what a bunch of moroooons'

[doc30]

Applying mathematical probability of natural selection to EVERY species on the planet, including plants, animals, sea creatures, and insects for each have evolved from a single cell has a probability of zero taking even the most extreme estimate of the earths age into consideration.

That is a bogus arguement. These 'probability' functions require precise understanding of all physical interactions involved. In your example, these come form hand waving arguements so the whole premise falls apart.

[Sam Cree]

"Evolution is a religion just as any others."

Please justify that. I notice a constant theme on FR is that everything someone opposes must be a "religion."

[laredo44]

Of course then there is that sticky problem of when time began and where did all that matter come from that was involved in the big bang.

Unlike IDers who see no problem issuing NOYB explanations for whence the intelligence came. Are you postulating that the explanation you mock scientists for not currently having is one they will never understand?