[Celtjew Libertarian]

This is the stuff of science fiction.

Yeah, and I may have come up with my story idea for the nextNational Novel Writing Month this November.

But how can you test for the cause of anomalies if you don't have a history or a possible history?

Aye, there's the rub.

I don't for example, have explanations for all cases of crying statues, ESP, UFOs and such, but I trust my intuition about such things, and hold a placemarker for them in case one of them acquires better evidence.

Pretty much the same.... Thing is, it bugs me as much, when scientists take a "It's not science, therefore, it doesn't exist," attitude, as when people try to add their religion to science.

I'll am interested in similarities and points of agreement between science and various mysticisms.... But I admit that's philosophy.

[js1138]

This is very simple. the Discovery Institute is right about one thing. ID needs to have some science before it claims to be science. It's interesting that all the so-called holes in evolution theory are the result of the normal workings of mainstream science. Pride and ambition insure that every crevice will be explored. The best prizes in science are reserved for people who overturn old ideas.