Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

You can repeat your claim as many times as you wish, but ID is not a hypothesis that can be tested by science. Why do you thing the Discovery Institute backed out of the trial?

It's because they admit they have no way of researching their claims.


133 posted on 09/28/2005 9:53:32 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
"ID is not a hypothesis that can be tested by science."

Even if you were right, the hypothesis should still be mentioned.

Science doesn't develop the test before the hypothesis, but rather the hypothesis before the test.

141 posted on 09/28/2005 10:18:07 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson