Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highball; Antonello
I disagree that they would have taught it as science, yes.

It was taught as a fact, and if someone objected the Founders would have had the objector take it up with their school board, not a court.

I'm using "creationism" as the example since it was the case at the time. "Creationism" and ID are not synonymous.

Would either of you object to teaching that life developed without a designer?

139 posted on 09/28/2005 2:44:51 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7
It was taught as a fact, and if someone objected the Founders would have had the objector take it up with their school board, not a court.

Actually, the major reason behind the public school movement in the first place was because of concern regarding religious teachings being provided in the private institutions that made up the school system of the time, beginning in 1818, when Boston became the first American city to establish a complete government-financed school system, and continuing up through the 1830s and 40s with Horace Mann and the rise of the government school system.

Before that time there were no tax-funded schools, so of course the founders would have no jurisdiction over those school boards.

145 posted on 09/28/2005 3:17:05 PM PDT by Antonello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson