Intelligent design on trial

Washington Times ^ | 9/28/05

[Malygris]

When did I say religious thoughts were flawed?
I said arguments based on religion were flawed.
Your reading comprehension is a bit lacking.

MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU READ BEFORE COMMENTING.

I already prooved religious arguments to be flawed.
No one knows if their beliefs are any more right then anyone else's. If everyone's equally right then whose' beliefs should we follow?
This comes down to personnal opinion in the end.

People believing the earth flat did not make it flat so this personnal opinion argument is flawed. If this personnal opinion argument is wrong then so can any other arguments that are based on personnal opinion, like religious beliefs, How do you discern which are true and which are wrong based on just opinions? You can't so the argument is flawed.

The only way that religion can become a valid argument is if you can proove the existence of what you believe in since they would then be facts instead of opinions.

Different fossils that are in between apes and human show steps between monkey and human. Which clearly suggest that we did not appear as we are. If we did then we would have found human fossil from the start.

Unless you provide an explanation and show how it is better then evolution to explain the data we have your just talking out of your behind.

I'm not interested in discussing with individuals who are certain they know the truth even though they have zero evidence to back up their claims.

[CodeToad]

Are you always such an ass?

[Malygris]

That's no argument. Insults from strangers don't bother me.
The bible says Judge not lest ye be judged. WISE WORDS.


And you still did not counter any of my arguments.
Logic is not nice, it's cold and brutal. GET USED TO IT.
That applies both ways, it's a double edged sword.

OUT.