Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrats Go Dumpster Diving
GOP USA ^ | 09-28-05 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 09/27/2005 9:37:55 PM PDT by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Sorry, I have no pic to post of the lovely Michelle. Maybe somebody can post one and keep me out of trouble!
1 posted on 09/27/2005 9:37:55 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I have her memorized : )


2 posted on 09/27/2005 9:43:50 PM PDT by calrighty (`Nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Coastal Dems are missing the boat. In SD, the state's big newspaper does the dumpster diving on Republicans so that the Daschle Dems can keep their hands clean.


3 posted on 09/27/2005 9:55:14 PM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Dems' invasive -- and obviously illegal -- dumpster diving.

Yes, this is low...even for Democrats...but dumpster-diving isn't illegal. Depositing trash in a collection area constitutes abandonment. There is no assurance of privacy at all once that has occurred. That's why you're supposed to use shredders, people. (And don't forget to mix up the shreddings with goodies from the critter litter box for color.)

4 posted on 09/27/2005 10:09:29 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
From the article

Under federal law, it is illegal to knowingly and willfully obtain a credit report under false pretenses. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act imposes a maximum two-year prison sentence for the crime.

This is a crime, however...JFK

5 posted on 09/27/2005 10:14:09 PM PDT by BADROTOFINGER (Life sucks. Get a helmet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BADROTOFINGER
Knowingly and willfully obtaining a credit report under false pretenses is a crime, yes.

All the same, dumpster-diving still isn't a crime.

6 posted on 09/27/2005 10:15:39 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
(And don't forget to mix up the shreddings with goodies from the critter litter box for color.)

And aroma.

7 posted on 09/27/2005 10:16:23 PM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Well, it's a catchy title nonetheless! :)

The actual crime here is knowingly obtaining a credit report under false pretenses.

8 posted on 09/27/2005 10:21:22 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

i do wish she'd not tried to be clever, it will simply drown her in a flood of nitpicks about how this isn't dumpster diving.


9 posted on 09/27/2005 10:25:16 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
I just noticed this was posted by Coastal under a different title.Sorry for the dupe.Delete at will! ;o)
10 posted on 09/27/2005 10:35:24 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

We need to compile all these incidents at one web address so Repubs can pull out the litany the next time the MSM & Dems jump all over a minor Repub infraction.

Good defense means good offense!


11 posted on 09/27/2005 10:36:16 PM PDT by strategofr (What did happen to those 293 boxes of secret FBI files (esp on Senators) Hillary stole?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Under Fed law, knowingly and unlawfuly obtaining 900+ FBI files is illegal. And the FBI is NOT INTERESTED!!!!!!! Junior Sen. from N.Y. included!


12 posted on 09/27/2005 10:37:40 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr; Mia T
You're right! Mia T has extensive info on dem crimes.This may be of interest.
13 posted on 09/27/2005 10:44:54 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

14 posted on 09/27/2005 11:03:38 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing









15 posted on 09/27/2005 11:10:17 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
Thank You! I'm off the hook! ;o)
16 posted on 09/27/2005 11:14:19 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
The law being violated in the 1974 Fair Credit Reporting Act which calls for a MINIMUM $2500 fine for unauthorized access and jail time up to a year. Even if you are in Congress, this law applies to you. No official duty nonsense gets you off on this one. The FTC is the enforcement body and they bust people every day for this exact thing.

Whats really great about this one is that the credit bureaus can go back and track which company requested the credit report on Steele or anyone else and they can then track it back to a specific individual who forged the written release for such information (since nobody which credit bureau access would be dumb enough to just do this with a paper trail to cover their butt). And once the company who requested the illegal record is located, they get audited by the credit bureau and all of the other requests they submitted with also be investigated. So not only will we have the illegal access of the record, but a forgery somewhere which can be analyzed for handwriting to link it to a specific criminal-to-be and we get the list of other victims. The credit bureaus are going to want to cooperate on this one to ensure that Congress doesn't pass more idiotic laws making it even harder for LEGAL access to these files.

And.....the real kicker is that in 1999 the Financial Privacy Information Act passed which allows private citizens to SUE FOR DAMAGES for illegal access of their private records - just for situations like this. So Steele can file suit and just start deposing people right and left. It could be an absolute Paula Jones trial but with real consequences this time.

17 posted on 09/28/2005 12:57:03 AM PDT by bpjam (Now accepting liberal apologies.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

"Chuckaquiddick"......I like it! Sure beats the obvious and banal "Schumergate"


18 posted on 09/28/2005 5:23:50 AM PDT by NRA1995 (When liberals speak I hear the Vonage music playing.....woo-hoo, woo-hoo-hoo....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The mainstream media can get downright snotty when it is revealed that THEY are covering up any reporting on "dirty tricks" by the very partisan politicians whom they support.

The Dem'crat senatorial campaign committee is practicing abuse of Social Security numbers for purposes other than legitimate provisions of the law, and the ACLU says NOTHING? States are not even allowed to use the Social Security number in conjunction with issuance of driver's licenses, and it may appear nowhere on voter rolls in any jurisdiction. And worse, the abuse is being perpetrated on behalf of Chuck Schumer, who evidently sincerely believes that the restrictions do not apply to HIM.

Even Medicare has ceased issuing cards that have the beneficiary's Social Security number, instead issuing a SECONDARY number that is put down on all the filings for claims.


19 posted on 09/28/2005 6:21:47 AM PDT by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bpjam; alloysteel
Thanks muchly for the info and feedback.:)

This is a story I want to keep up with.If you see anything more about this,please ping me!

FRegards...

20 posted on 09/28/2005 8:40:28 AM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson