Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canadian Women’s Group Exposes Homosexual Activist Opposition to Child Porn Law
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | 9/26/05

Posted on 09/27/2005 4:04:59 PM PDT by dukeman

OTTAWA– Influential gay activist political tactics against child porn laws and raising the age of consent has been a disturbing and on-going phenomenon that the public is not aware of according to leaders of organizations fighting child porn.

On July 20, Canada’s House of Commons passed Bill C-2 which added amendments to the Criminal Code on matters related to child pornography. Gwen Landolt, National Vice President of REAL Women of Canada, says that the amendments were helpful but still do not provide full protection for vulnerable children. Furthermore, in a detailed article scheduled for the September 26th edition of REAL Women’s Reality magazine, Landolt reveals there was predictably strong opposition from Canada’s homosexual activist organizations to C-2.

Bill C-2, says Landolt “includes some serious loopholes for those charged with violations of our child pornography law”. Some of the problems she identifies are:

1.The defence of “artistic merit” to a charge of child pornography was retained.

2. No minimum sentence was included in the bill when it was introduced in the House of Commons.

3. It did not include a provision to raise the age of consent from 14 years to 16 years "despite the fact that the Provincial Attorneys General had approved, at their annual federal/provincial meetings in October 1998, December 1999, and again in September 2003, to raise the age of consent'.

Landlolt notes that Canada’s most prominent, and often government funded, homosexual activist organization, EGALE, opposes raising the age of consent and that the mild amendments to the child pornography law “made the homosexual community decidedly unhappy”.

Revealing the extraordinary influence of the homosexual organizations on government policy Landolt notes, “it is well known that the Liberal government never brings forward legislation unless it has passed inspection by the homosexual lobby.”

The article reports that the Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Ontario (CLGRO) submitted a brief to the committee considering C-2 and complained that the bill would deny lesbian, gay and bisexual teens the free expression of their sexuality and create more circumstances in which sexual relations with adolescents would be criminalized.

CLGRO stated in its brief that “younger persons are capable of seeking and do seek out consensual same-sex relationships with older persons and, in fact, may be the initiators of such relationships. In addition, contrary to popular belief, a relationship with an older person may not in fact be damaging for a young person”.

The national newspaper, the Globe and Mail, “which never fails to promote the homosexual agenda”, says Landolt, also opposed the C-2 amendments. In a July 6 editorial it stated that Bill C-2 was “extreme” and objected to the limits placed on freedom of expression.

The REAL Women article concludes by warning that “The homosexual activists’ objection to Bill C-2, together with the Globe and Mail editorial, are setting the stage for our liberal judges to overturn the child pornography law at the first opportunity they get”.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deviants; gay; gaypedophiles; homosexualagenda; pedophiles; perverts

1 posted on 09/27/2005 4:05:00 PM PDT by dukeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; scripter

fyi


2 posted on 09/27/2005 4:06:32 PM PDT by jla (http://www.deletehillary.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

If ya can't reproduce, ya gotta recruit...


3 posted on 09/27/2005 4:08:00 PM PDT by null and void (I'm a patient and peaceful man. Threaten me or mine, and that changes. Then, I am a vengeful man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

The previous Democrat governor of Hawaii opposed a raising of the age of consent. The Democrat legislature overruled him.

The odd thing about Hawaii is that the people here as conservative as many of the southern of the states, but the people here insist on voting Democrat.

Something about the mellow weather and all the salt water seems to inoculate them against such infectious Republican/conservative ideas like common sense.

Hawaii rejected gay marriage, but supports to the hilt the party that supports it.


4 posted on 09/27/2005 4:20:07 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Bump.


5 posted on 09/27/2005 4:26:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

Yep. Not only that, but the loudest voices AGAINST raising the age of consent (from 14 to 16) were heterosexual voices.


6 posted on 09/27/2005 4:34:32 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

How dare those Canadian women engage in criminal hate speech and oppose any jot or tittle of the homosexual activist agenda!


7 posted on 09/27/2005 5:24:25 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson