Posted on 09/27/2005 9:12:23 AM PDT by Junior
2005-09-26 Creationism, Christianity, and Common Sense
2005-09-26 Creationism, Intelligent Design, and Evolution
2005-09-26 Dispute over evolution goes on trial in U.S. court
2005-09-26 Does Genesis hold up under critics scrutiny? (Creation/Evolution)
2005-09-26 New Analyses Bolster Central Tenets of Evolution Theory
2005-09-26 The Problem With Evolution
2005-09-26 With world watching, trial starts
2005-09-25 In Evolution Debate, Creationists Are Breaking New Ground
2005-09-24 The trouble with Darwin (Bush's I.D. comments changed Australia's Educational Landscape)
2005-09-23 Ultimate thread on Dover, Pennsylvania's Evolution v. Intelligent Design trial
2005-09-22 Court Case Threatens to 'Drag Science into the Supernatural'
2005-09-22 Evan Jamieson, hydrometallurgy (Creation/Evolution)
2005-09-22 Insight into our sight: A new view on the evolution of the eye lens (Desperate conjuncture)
2005-09-22 Intelligent Design: An Ambiguous Assault on Evolution
2005-09-22 Intelligent designers down on Dover
2005-09-22 Intelligible Design
2005-09-21 Intelligent design? Not on this campus [Pennsylvania]
2005-09-21 Researchers create functioning artificial proteins using nature's rules
Crevo Warrior Freepdays for the month of September:
2005-09-17 Arnhart
2001-09-06 atlaw
2004-09-22 coffee260
2004-09-15 Diana in Wisconsin
2001-09-17 Dimensio
2003-09-25 gobucks
2001-09-14 Heartlander
2004-09-13 johnnyb_61820
2004-09-09 LouAvul
2004-09-16 ml1954
2003-09-14 neverdem
2003-09-09 RightWingAtheist
1998-09-17 tallhappy
2003-09-25 truthfinder9
1999-09-23 Tumbleweed_Connection
In Memoriam. Fallen Crevo Warriors:
ALS
Aric2000
bluepistolero
ConservababeJen
DittoJed2
f.Christian
goodseedhomeschool
gore3000
jedigirl
JesseShurun
medved
metacognative
Modernman
peg the prophet
RickyJ
SeaLion
Tomax
Bring back SeaLion and Mondernman!
Oh no. Not another crevo thread
I don't see a problem with them mentioning the theory in school. School is a place that people learn, after all.
They are not asking the same disclaimer for gravitational theory, or electrical theory, or atomic theory, are they?
Isn't it natural and healthy to doubt everything?
I think we've both posted the same article. This is getting confusing. We ought to settle on one thread.
Fine with me. I thought I beat everyone else to the punch.
Certainly. However, why single out the theory of evolution for a disclaimer?
Really? Explain.
Just wait. Someone will notice Joshua 10 verse 13, (The sun delayed going down about a full day), and demand a new theory of Newtonian mechanics that allows for the non-conservation of angular momentum. This conservation is 'only a theory' which 'has never been proven' after all.
Or maybe they will just challenge the heliocentric model of the solar system. All that astronomy may just be unproven theories as well...
Can I bill you for my bypass surgery when I need it?
"Intelligent Design, on the other hand, does not meet the criteria to be considered a scientific theory. Therefore it is impossible to prove or disprove it, or study it using scientific methods".
Honestly, if folks knew a tenth of what they think they know when it comes to the Theory of Evolution, this trial would never have occured.
Try this essay for a possible explanation of the long day.
http://www.zealllc.com/2002/astrology.htm
`People feel most strongly regarding things about which they know the least.' Montaigne
Or something like that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.