Only if they were being intellectually honest would they refer to ID as creationism.
ID posits the existence of a designer (read: creator). It is, of course, creationism, without allowing a discussion of the designer (read: creator).
Did the designer not create the designs? If the designer did, of course the designer is the creator, hence ID is a theory based on creationism. If the designer did not create the designs, why would we even be having this discussion.
Please ID'ers, follow your own logic. Fine if you don't want to call it a theory of Christian creationism, but call it what it is, a creationist theory (wherein we avoid all discussions of the designer/creator as they are not "relevant").
We all recognize the sharp differences of opinion on the crevo threads, but if everyone will make an effort to focus their comments on the issues, rather than the personal characteristics of the folks with whom they disagree, the threads will be far more pleasant.
Carry on.