"Shattering the Myths of Darwinism".
"Darwin's Black Box".
"Darwin on Trial".
Not Biblical creationism. There's holes in Darwin's theory. I'm not a scientist, I can't debate with scietists or use much scientific terminology. I read the books, they're convincing, and Darwin's theory and its promoters are not.
Have a nice day!
Agreed. You read demagoguic nonsense written for a non-technical audience, and you admit you don't understand the arguments, but rather than trying to fix the obvious problem my educating yourself, you instead choose to argue from a position of ignorance.
Do you find this debate tactic works well in other situations?