I think we are on the same page. I am actually ticked off at the reporter for not doing a bit more digging on the story. There are many unanswered questions. I do not doubt the he signed away Shuma. I also have no doubt that it might be legally binding.
Having said that, if there is someone who has offered their legal where with all to help explore his options I say go for it.
14 months or 14 years Shuma was the family pet. It was loved and loved enough that they weren't going to turn it out on the street either from the hurricane or from relatives who denied Shuma to stay at their home.
Nevills is morally bankrupted. To say the family has bonded as the reason for keeping the dog says so much of her character doesn't 14 months of bonding trump 3 weeks? She also went on the radio last week saying that Wyrick had lied of his being a hurricane victim. He is but it is tough to un ring the bell.
I do appreciate all point's of view. I just hope public pressure will help her do the right thing.
There's so many questionable and contradictory facts coming out, I'm reluctant to take a side... to do so requires us to accept the facts we want to think are true, and argue against facts we don't like.
Right now, we don't know even how old the dog is for sure. Who knows for sure anything else?