Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darnright
I did not say to have the government do it. What is wrong with the SPCA? I am not talking about careful and concerned breeders. I hate the puppy mills. Have you ever seen documentaries on tv about them? Well, I have. Those dogs live in horrible conditions.

My two dogs live in the house. I keep the house cooler than I like it because Harm (my Alaskan Malamute/Siberian Husky/Lab cross) likes it that way. I give him the kind of food that he likes, no matter what the cost. I also buy food for the 17 year old sheltie, Teddy, that he prefers. I cook for him when he won't eat. I don't even cook for myself!!! I eat Lean Cuisines nuked! I also bought Harm an SUV (small one) because he was not comfortable in my Avalon.

So, don't try to say that I don't love dogs and that I want them put outside. I had to board Harm recently while my daughter took care of Teddy. I made sure the vet housed Harm in air conditioned quarters with a run and not in a cage. I make certain that my dogs have the best of everything!!! My cats, too.
184 posted on 09/27/2005 6:06:50 PM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: Goodgirlinred

>
So, don't try to say that I don't love dogs and that I want them put outside.<

Here is the fact of the matter. _IF_ you want all hobby, or family breeders under inspection, you bring them under the Animal Welfare Act, which is under the USDA. Then you have the regulations against keeping dogs in the person's residence. You can't have it both ways; this is the price of mandatory, nationwide inspections.

SPCA's are local, and do not have jurisdiction. If you have local animal control doing inspections, you not only risk spreading heaven only knows what disease from kennel to kennel, but you place an undue burden on animal control, from a monetary, and human resource point of view. Animal control can't even make everyone leash their dogs, but we're now going to expect them to inspect everyone who raises a litter of puppies a year?

Were you aware the AKC inspects people who breed 7 or more litters a year? They do not have regulatory powers, ie government power, but they can revoke individual registrations, suspend a person's ability to use the registry, and issue fines. If a person is convicted of cruelty to animals, his privilege to use AKC services is suspended, sometimes permanently.

Of course, if a shady breeder is blackballed by AKC, they go to the Continental Kennel Club (CKC) or some other "alternative" registry, and John Q Public buys the pups nonetheless. Papers are papers, after all. And, of course, the buyer has no responsibility to do any checkup on the breeder from which he buys that cute little Yorkie-Poo for his kiddies.

AKC is a non-profit organization. It keeps the stud books (pedigrees) for the individual breeds, and it holds dog events, including field trials, dog shows, obedience trials and agility trials, to name a few. It cannot keep dog breeders honest, nor does it write individual breed standards. Thus, the Bulldog Club of America, a member club of AKC, decides whether the dogs have pushed in faces, not AKC itself.


186 posted on 09/27/2005 6:38:41 PM PDT by Darnright (Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson