Posted on 09/27/2005 6:18:50 AM PDT by ElCapusto
You disagree, squirt-klavern?
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!
You got your doo rag on back words.
"Back words." Back words? Oh! Backwards!
You got something against ebonics
I've always been puzzled by African-Americans calling Bill Clinton the first black president. He wasn't especially nice to them, that I recall. In fact, he was openly aggressive and abusive to blacks when he thought he needed political push from whites.
I concluded that it was because during his presidency he violated what we consider civilized norms of society, he defamed the Office of the President. He committed crimes and basically told those who frowned on his actions to "shove it," and he got away with it. In short, he displayed his contempt for traditional American societal behavior.
I believe that there is an underlying feeling of contempt for traditional values that permeates the black community in the United States. It's this contempt for traditional values that bonds blacks with Bill Clinton. They wish they could show their contempt (as the looters and shooters did) and get away with it like Clinton.
It will be there as long as the demorats thirst for power justifies what they are doing to these people. They need to be able to depend on those votes.
I look for the politicians in Louisiana to call for some type of absentee ballot arrangement for the 250,000 demorat votes that left New Orleans. Without them, they can't win.
"As New Orleans is physically rebuilt, this political economy of poverty must be demolished"
But it won't be. Not when the rebuilding itself is just another gvt handout.
Those who would fall all over themselves to throw $ an NO should realize the part they play in enabling this cycle to continue.
So very true.
My take on the reason for this is that Black folks always give 90 plus % of their votes to the democrats..... no matter what the time fram......no matter what the candidates qualities....no matter what the issues.....And thats a certified fact.
We all know that all people are created physically, emotionally, and intellectually equal and the related qualities of parents do not matter and in no way are passed on ....Only the environment of growing up matters......Ohhhhhh yes!!!!
And it's a "certified fact" that we black people have poor genetics, right? Ain't that right?
You certified asshole.
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!
'All people are . . . equal . . . Only the environment of growing up matters . . .'
If I understand what squirt-gun is trying to say, many black people are doomed to scraping along, `gaming the system', satisfying only lower level needs due to their poor genes, but to distract attention from (on its face) racist position, he uses the liberals' tired strawman position: "It is society's fault: due to his bad environment that the poor child a.) shot-gunned his entire class." b.) looted c.) raped Neville's daughter as a 'red herring'.
His rejoinder is beside the point. "Corruption of blood" is specifically mentioned in the Constitution as a belief and practice we left behind in Europe. And "eugenics" has been discarded by thnking people since late April, 1945.
"At least you didn't take a single word, divide in two, and still jack it up"
That's what Calypso Louie Farrakhan did...thus leading him to the conclusion that whitey blew up the levees in New Orleans!(sarcasm on)
I commend you on your restraint. I would have called him worse.
pretty much correct.
It's all good. He's in check now. Mate's in three.
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!
You have the patience of a saint. Me, I fly off the handle.
"corruption of blodd has absolutely nothing to do with what anyone is saying here...those casting abuse, or those in honest debate.
Corruption of blodd has only to do with TREASON....The definition relating to the constitution is as follows:
"Corruption of Blood was part of ancient English penalty for treason. It was usually part of a Bill of Attainder, which normally sentenced the accused to death. The corruption of blood would forbid the accused's family from inhereting his property. Such bills and punishments were often inflicted upon Tories by colonial governments immediately following independence.
Have a nice day.
you made up those quotes, right?
Not really. I just go where the evidence leads me. For example:
White Nationalist Group Targets Free Republic For Infiltration
Keeping things like this in mind helps.
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!
The author of this article is stretching quite a bit when he says that the ethnic make up of the two areas he sites are similar. They are not.
That said I am not casting my lot with any notions of genetics. I just thought a false premise should be pointed out.
Squirt:
Look, you might think you're being clever, but you seem to have missed (even though I spelled it out for you) or have conveniently ignored a salient fact the author puts forword: even though there were near-identical racial makeups in nearby cities, that were as badly hit as NO, it was only in NO where we saw the near-complete civil breakdown. If other places with the same kind of people DID NOT devolve so utterly, what's the explanation? A reasonable person, Sherlock, would hit upon the type of dependent class created, and the parasitical government that has evolved to host them, as an explanation.
Note that I said a reasonable person.
Not EVERY situation that comes up is going to fit your default template of racial inferiority-superiority, no matter how hard you try to force it.
So think about it, and shut up. If you pop back with one more racist remark, I'm reporting you. And they'll kick you off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.