[PigRigger]

There was no analysis of what the documents actually said, no work done to look at the content, no comparison with the official record, no phone calls made to check the facts of the story, nothing beyond a cursory and politically motivated examination of the typeface. That was all they had to attack, but that was enough.

WOW....this is what the talking points were with the democrats after the criticism arose....."Doesn't matter whether they are forgeries, what really matter is whether they are true or not"....

Think about it, a so called news organization admits, that facts be damned,...the end justifies the means....

Truly scary stuff....IMHO

[Ludicrous]

But would they react the same way if an anonymous source produced say....a Roll Call & Meeting Minutes document from the VVAW meeting where Kerry and his fellow traitors plotted to assassinate US Senators?
Would that be treated as an important story - accurate no matter the credibility of the evidence?