[Lazamataz]

There was no analysis of what the documents actually said, no work done to look at the content, no comparison with the official record, no phone calls made to check the facts of the story, nothing beyond a cursory and politically motivated examination of the typeface

The documents were proven to be frauds, and yet we are obligated to "analyze what they said, look at the content, and compare them with the official record?"

Liberals are utterly insane.

[Dems_R_Losers]

But there WAS plenty of analysis of the content as well as the typefaces of these memos within 24 hours of their release, by people here at FR as well as at Powerline, LGF, and other sites. There was mention that the term "CYA" may not have been in use in 1972; that General Staudt, who was supposedly pressuring Lt. Col. Killian in 1973, had actually retired from the TANG in 1972; that memos were not used to order Guardsmen to report for physicals, they used letters; etc. Mapes is FOS.

[steve-b]

The documents were proven to be frauds, and yet we are obligated to "analyze what they said, look at the content, and compare them with the official record"?

This sounds like the legal procedure used at the trial of the Knave of Hearts in Alice in Wonderland.

[rock58seg]

and compare them with the official record?" Liberals are utterly insane.

Seems if they varied from the official record, they would be suspect, and probably incorrect.