Based on your relentless assault on the morals and values of this Christian school administration, with only limited information available to the rest of us, it appears you really do believe you have these powers.
"Well... yes actually minored in it (moral theology). How bout you?"
I don't claim expertise in anything I minored in, that's just vanity. If I were a moral theologian however, I'd need to know far more than what a news article says about how and why this child was dismissed before I'd cast aspersions on this Christian school administration.
Methinks you have a deeper interest in defending this homosexual 'family' than you let on.
"It is apparent that you did not read my posts, so I will take out my hand puppets and explain it again. I am all for the following of the moral agreement that the student signed..."
There is no such thing as a 'morally bound' contract, either it's legally binding or it's not.
In any case, as has been well established, (but seems to have escaped the radar of your hand puppets' little brain), this Christian school assumes both the student and the student's parents into their school, (because parents are very much involved in the school's programs and overall moral identity). This being the case, even your puppet-sized cerebral cortex should understand that unless one of the three parties has been designated with the authority to sign for all three, no one person of the three parties involved can sign a binding contract for all three family members; moral, legal, or otherwise.
All three parties must honor the enrollment contract and abide by the school's moral codes and standards. If either the girl or her lesbian 'mothers' dishonor the school's contract or codes of conduct then the school has the obligation to their other students and families to enforce their moral standards.
"Non believers send their kids to religious schools all the time because of the education and the Christian environment."
"Non-believer" is far too generic a term to use in this debate, it's an intentionally obscure term. It means anything from Communists to Hindus, from Buddhists to Jews, from atheists to opposing Christian denominations.
(If you can prove how many people from this list attend Christian Schools then go for it, but please, no more straw men standing out in the fog).
"They foolishly believe that students will bennefit from a religious environment...."
If they end up feeling like fools because they've sent their children to a Christian School, they are free to leave at any time for a public school, or any other school of their liking.
"However I am not the one that seems to be doubting the power of the Holy Spirit to work here."
It's a Christian school with an educational charter, not an Evangelical Mission or Christian Outreach Center. Their primary job is not to reach out and convert non-Christians, but to educate the children of already practicing Christians. This is their primary function.
For some hidden reason you'd like people to believe this school is supposed to reach out with the Holy Spirit to every child whose parents are opposed to Christian teachings, this is just not the case. It's neither a Mission or a Church, it's a SCHOOL.
"I have been saying ... did the school give her the chance or did they base the decision souly on the behavior of the mother? If so I think that was bad judgement."
Did the school give her the chance to what, sit in class and hear everyday that her lesbian 'mothers' are living in grave sin, they aren't a real family in God's eyes. It's OBVIOUSLY an inappropriate place for died-in-the-wool lesbians to send their child to for an education. The lesbians are too callous to comprehend this, but the school wasn't, thank God.
"They sent their older daughter to the same school for years and didnt file a lawsuit."
Your making stuff up again. The article clearly says they claimed to have sent another daughter to other Christian schools.
"I would say her deeper dilema is living with a mother that will be losing her soul than anything. My question to you is what is better for the daughter? To be around Christian Friends and families that model compassion, mercy , love and grace. Or to be kicked out and made a spectical of due to her mothers sin?
My answer is that it would be better if the "mothers" had not used their daughter as a pawn in the first place. They placed the school in an impossible situation by hiding their true identity from the start. They endangered their daughter by doing this as well.
And if they did not intend her to be pawn THEN STOP USING HER AS ONE and quietly put the girl into another school.
The greater lesson here is to let the lesbians, the girl and the world understand that there are massive consequences for living this lifestyle, and greater repercussions yet for raising an innocent child into this abominable 'lifestlye'.
The homosexual 'parents' must understand that they can't change the world to suit their selfish little desires, but they must either conform themselves to the world or at least don't be selfish and cruel enough to bring an innocent child into the mess.
"If you say there are rules and they must be followed you have missed the entire concept of why Christ came. ESPECIALLY coming from a school with the idea of teaching Christian standards."
Simply not true. According to Scripture Jesus Christ broke nearly every rule the Jews had lived under prior to His Incarnation. This is precisely why they hated Jesus. He performed miracles on the Sabbath, He associated with 'sinners', He ate and drank wine while others fasted, He taught His own Commandments, He preached His own doctrine, He called the Pharisees 'sons of the devil', He founded His own Church.
"I will remind all of us here..... " The measure you use to measure out grace to others it will be used to measured to you."
I hope you remember this the next time you castigate the Christian school administrators for doing what they believe is morally right and responsible. Also remember you own words before you judge anybody based on a small article in the media.
FYI, Lesbian Parents are suing a Catholic School in Eugene, Oregon for refusing their 'daughter' entry. I believe this all a well planned attack. ~ EUGENE, Oregon, August 5, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) -
"They sent their older daughter to the same school for years and didnt file a lawsuit."
Your making stuff up again. The article clearly says they claimed to have sent another daughter to other Christian schools."
Since you can not read and you brought this fact up in the forum I will repost what I wrote in our mail....
Clark and her partner, Mitzi Gray, have been together for 22 years. They didn't expect Shay would experience discrimination at the school because her older sister had attended Ontario Christian schools from sixth through ninth grade. Additionally, Shay said her friends knew she lived in a home with two mothers, and "it was never a problem."
If you want to debate the facts... LEARN THE FACTS before you make a fool out of yourself accusing me of making up facts YOU DIDNT READ! Since I can not control your inability to understand the article we are debating it is a waste of my time to try to get the point across. So end of discussion with you.