"My sexual orientation should have nothing to do with her getting an education,"
[SAMS]: "..and it won't, at a taxpayer funded school where [they] EMBRACE this behavior."
________________________
As though the only place Shay Clark can get an education is that particular kind of school, a school whose requirements this family knew they didn't meet.
To me, the issue has nothing to do with SC being deprived of educational opportunity. She can get that at many other schools. It has to do with this family crashing somebody's party and then whining when they are shown the door.
I'm started to believe this was a "set-up" from the very beginning, they are using their daughter to push an agenda. It's like when Mom's tried enrolling their daughters in Boy Scouts...
I would agree with this argument except for the fact her sister attended the same school and the women have been together for 22 years. Why was this not an issue for the other students then?