[rdb3]

I know a few friends of mine who voted for Perot in 1992 and who in later years said they regretted having tossed away their votes, even if they were trying to show their dissatisfaction with Bush Sr at that time.

That reminds me of people here who say that they want to send the GOP a message at election time. But that begs the question: Who does that actually benefit?

Sending messages like that is what led up to the WTC falling to the ground.

I'm a Pub, and will make no bones about it. The level of spending going on at the moment is sickening, I'll admit. But what do we really have in D.C.? You have a spending party, the Pubs, and an hostile and demonstrably anti-American major party who reveres Karl Marx. The latter is the Democrats. In this light, money becomes fairly meaningless.

The Pubs will definitely defend this nation. The Dems want to give it away to the United Nations.

If one purports loving this nation, how could he or she allow any Dem near the Oval Office as President?

If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!

[adorno]

If one purports loving this nation, how could he or she allow any Dem near the Oval Office as President?

That should be the bottom line message for this thread.

[metalurgist]

If one purports loving this nation, how could he or she allow any Dem near the Oval Office as President?

Or in any other office where they can wield power.

[mountainfolk]

Very well said.