FairOpinion must be making much more sense than that to you, or you wouldn't be taking every opportunity to impugn his/her motives by the namecalling you supposedly eschew.
Every time I almost believe that what you're saying makes sense, you nullify yourself with barbs, as if your logic can't stand on its own.
FairOpinion's acumen is very consistent, as is Tom McClintock's.
She is effective, not logical. Her pronouncements make sense to those who are uninformed because they rely upon standard Republican truisms but deliberately obfuscate how "moderate" GOP policy is at variance to those traditional Republican standards and principles. Hence, she'll cheer an Arnold speech about how he'll cut spending, but disappear when confronted with the fact that Arnold's budgets have increased spending faster than Davis ever did. She'll post early in a thread to make the cheerleading visible and then bug out when challenged with facts and references.
Given the information she has been provided from original sources over hundreds of posts over the last two years, it is too often deliberate misinformation in support of a destructive hierarchy, a true antidisestablishmentarian. The refutation gets tiring, but it must be done; else it is allowing false advertising to stand. The problem is that it is reacitve, comes later in the thread, and takes more time than bald-faced assertions.