Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon
Also you failed to see my /sarc> tag at the end of that statement on what you responded too.

Wolf
296 posted on 09/27/2005 11:04:42 AM PDT by RunningWolf (U.S. Army Veteran.....75-78)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: RunningWolf

Sometimes I tire of these threads.

NS is not that important a theory in science. It does not have that many inroads to applications.

It does not have many inroads to Medicine. It should.

Until the last 40 years, it was strictly a thought argument.

It has been superHyped by soft science biologists. As always, my apologies to the molecular geneticists, and hard core scientists that have advanced biology beyond its infancy.

Of course philosophy is never important to scientists, they will have the typical troubles of those that don't know how they know anything.

There are even very learned people that don't care about logic and reason, that pontificate about evolution. But they don't have a clue that they are the problem, not the solution.

They hide behind the skirts of others. I really don't like speaking to cowards that deny their own words.

They are pathetic.

Thanks wolf!

DK


297 posted on 09/27/2005 11:32:20 AM PDT by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson