[JamesP81]

I say luddites because I have yet to meet a creationsist who does not warp, twist and misrepresent science in their arguements. They have to destroy every field of modern science in order to rationalize their biblical, supernatural explanations. Perhaps it is not the best word. Perhaps either ignorant or lying would be more appropriate. As to you question, read the article, They actually explain the basis of their predictions. But then again, actually reading and understanding something about evolution is soenthing most creationists don't do.

So, according to you, creationists can't read? Thank you for proving my point about shrillness.

And no, I don't chalk up all the flame wars to evolutionists. Just the majority of them.

As I said earlier, this thread sucks. Officially.

[Thatcherite]

So, according to you, creationists can't read? Thank you for proving my point about shrillness.

Please point out where the OP said that "creationists can't read".

[spinestein]

[As I said earlier, this thread sucks. Officially.]




In spite of the fact that JamesP81 had a great deal to contribute to that eventuality, At this point I have to agree completely: this thread sucks.

[js1138]

So, according to you, creationists can't read?

They just haven't demonstrated the ability. When you are on a debate team, you have to be able to argue both sides of a question equally well. If you participate in a discussion, you need to be able to state your opponent's position accurately.

These are elementary qualifications that creationists fail to meet when arguing against evolution.

[doc30]

So, according to you, creationists can't read?

The proof is in the pudding. So far, it seems the more that gets posted about evolution, the less the creationists seem to understand. It seems clear to me that they either don't read, or skim over a lot becaue they don't want to understand the material.