Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
If you actually knew anything about molecular evolution or biology and acually had read the article in the recent Science concerning the Chimp's repeating element organization you'd know that the talk origins article you are fond of citing is dreadfully out of date and never has been really accurate.
44 posted on 09/26/2005 7:51:19 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: tallhappy

"If you actually knew anything about molecular evolution or biology and acually had read the article in the recent Science concerning the Chimp's repeating element organization you'd know that the talk origins article you are fond of citing is dreadfully out of date and never has been really accurate."

I have and I understand it, would you care to elaborate?


48 posted on 09/26/2005 8:25:27 AM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: tallhappy; PatrickHenry; Rightwing Conspiratr1; furball4paws; shuckmaster; curiosity
A new addition to the Talk Origin Creationist Claim list.

Claim CB144. Human and chimp genomes differ by more than one percent.

For years, evolutionists have hailed the chimpanzee as "our closest living relative" and have pointed out that the DNA is 98 to 99 percent identical between the two. Scientists now say the difference is 4 percent, double what they have been claiming for years.

Source:

DeWitt, David A. 2005. Chimp genome sequence very different from man.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0905chimp.asp

Response:

1. The difference between chimpanzees and humans due to single-nucleotide substitutions averages 1.23 percent, of which 1.06 percent or less is due to fixed divergence, and the rest being a result of polymorphism within chimp populations and within human populations. Insertion and deletion (indel) events account for another approximately 3 percent difference between chimp and human sequences, but each indel typically involves multiple nucleotides. The number of genetic changes from indels is a fraction of the number of single-nucleotide substitutions (roughly 5 million compared with roughly 35 million). So describing humans and chimpanzees as 98 to 99 percent identical is entirely appropriate (Chimpanzee Sequencing 2005).

2. The difference measurement depends on what you are measuring. If you measure the number of proteins for which the entire protein is identical in the two species, humans and chimpanzees are 29 percent identical (Chimpanzee Sequencing 2005). If you measure nonsynonymous base pair differences within protein coding regions, humans and chimps are 99.45 percent identical (Chen et al. 2001). Whatever measure is used, however, as long as the same measurement is used consistently, will show that humans are more closely related to chimpanzees (including the bonobo, sister species to the common chimpanzee) than to any other species.

References:

1. Chen, F.-C., E. J. Vallender, H. Wang, C.-S. Tzeng, and W.-H. Li. 2001. Genomic divergence between human and chimpanzee estimated from large-scale alignments of genomic sequences. _Journal of Heredity_ 92(6): 481-489.
2. Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium. 2005. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. _Nature_ 437: 69-87.

130 posted on 09/26/2005 7:44:16 PM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson