[DesertSapper]

Wow. I ask a question about a Freeper Darwinist's feelings about the ACLU alliance and I get this: "Your argument lacks substance, because it's based on a fallacy."

It wasn't an "argument" it was a valid question. My answer would have been a resounding "YES" as associations CAN and sometimes DO show more than coincidence. Whether or not that applies here remains to be seen.

[Dimensio]

My answer would have been a resounding "YES" as associations CAN and sometimes DO show more than coincidence. Whether or not that applies here remains to be seen.

Since you can't demonstrate it, though (because there's nothing more than the ACLU happening to take a position that is correct), you try to infer it through cheap and sleazy innuendo.