1. No, I will not answer your question because it is not a question.
2. If you believe this is unconstitional then that means you must consider the teacher in question to be congress, and the mentioning of a book about ID to be the establishment of a religion. Therefore--you're an idiot. I won't waste time on fools.
Nice reply.:)
Aw, but I used a question mark and everything! In seriousness, I suppose you could argue that it is a leading question along the lines of 'Have you stopped beating your wife?' so I will rephrase it as two questions:
Is the religious belief that a Creator is responsible for life as we know it being promoted as if it were science? And if so, is it in keeping with Christian beliefs to condone such an untruth?
2. If you believe this is unconstitional then that means you must consider the teacher in question to be congress, and the mentioning of a book about ID to be the establishment of a religion. Therefore--you're an idiot. I won't waste time on fools.
You asked a question and I gave a direct answer. That you intended it to be a loaded question is not my fault. It does surprise me that you profess to call me an idiot based on the premise that the public school system, not immediately being congress, isn't subject to the first amendment. Perhaps you are not familiar with EDWARDS v. AGUILLARD or Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District.