To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
How clever. They make the list "bi-partisan" by throwing in a couple of CBC members who could accept a bride on national TV and still get re-elected. The other 11 are Republicans who could actually be hurt by this if anyone took it seriously.
To: Buzz Crutcher
Yeah: Rangel, Jackson, and Jackson-Lee, Franklin, and other corrupt inner-city democrats are ignored (vote fraud, combined finances from for-profit/not-for-profit vote buying groups), receiving lawyer money directly, etc.)
Rules for corruption:
No democrat can be corrupt, no matter what they actually have done: if they are pro-abortion. No republican can be corrupt, no matter what they actually have done: if they are pro-abortion.
No republican is innocent of any charge, no matter how ridiculous, if they are conservative.
But 11 of 13 are republican put the list FOR ASSOCIATING with lobbyists (nothing proved yet) who are charged with corruption and (false) ethics "charges."
16 posted on
09/25/2005 7:43:59 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
To: Buzz Crutcher
Who were the D-rats on the list? I know, I know but I had to ask. :)
18 posted on
09/25/2005 7:46:46 AM PDT by
PeteB570
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson