The behavior of this woman is beyond the pale and frankly evil. To keep a pet because her family has bonded with the pet after 3 weeks verses the 14 years the pet spent with the original owners. What rational is that. What type of example is instilling in her kids.
Shuma has also been classified as service pet, helping his owner who is disabled. It appears that "service" is in the eye's of the beholder of some. Whether this is a service dog or pet, the man found housing that would allow Shuma, she should allow him his beloved friend back.
This article gives an update on who she is ... I think it is time to send email to all who she is affiliated with.
Not to worry. Dogs have a sixth sense. The first time she allows the dog unattended where he can move on his own, he'll go back to his original owner.
We had a miniature GS, which had rode in the back of a car from West Houston to Baytown. At a supermarket, she took off when a car door was left unattended. We thought it was the last we would ever see of her. About 3 weeks later she showed up back in West Houston on her own (at least no visible angels in attendance).
If the pet was intended for the original owner, not even a K-9 friend will be able to keep the pet from the intended master.
This infuriates me! They would have to hold me back from attacking this woman were this my dog!
bump
Bump for Shuma..