Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt

I saw his article.

Voting recommendations from Tom McClintock

#73 – YES
#74 – YES
#75 – YES
#76 – Yes
#77 – Yes
#78 – NO
#79 – NO
#80 – NO

Arnold's recommendations are exactly the same, with the exception that he recommends a YES vote on 78, because, otherwise 79 will surely pass. So again, we don't have a choice of both 78 & 79 being defeated, we have to choice of ending up with 79, if we don't support and vote yes on 78. Even so, it will be touch and go -- 79 is highly supported by a lot of CA people, who like the handouts, and "let the state take care of us". 78 was put on the ballot precisely, because they knew, that 79 passing was a sure thing -- this gives it a chance to have the votes split and end up with 78, instead of the dreadful 79.


38 posted on 09/25/2005 1:57:04 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion

Don't these initiatives require 2/3?


40 posted on 09/25/2005 4:38:08 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America has the greatest military on the face of the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson