not my point....they are saying there was no documentary evidence of Able Danger- I'm looking for a link to see the CoPosts attitude towards the Dwoning Street memo...and the "minutes" were never presented...in fact they accuser said he destroyed them.
"the "minutes" were never presented...in fact they accuser said he destroyed them."
Off topic and slight nitpick, but this seems to be a common mistake. The journalist in question did not destroy any of the original copies of the minutes. They were photocopied and returned immediately. At some point he destroyed his photocopies, having transcribed them (presumably there was something on them which could potentially identify the source).