Posted on 09/24/2005 10:09:29 AM PDT by Sam Hill
This is an article by the avowed socialist editor for The Nation, David Corn. In it Corn points out the background of the organizers of today's ANSWER rally on the Mall in Washington, DC.
Those speaking at the demonstration today are much the same speakers who are always appear at these ANSWER rallies.
Apart from newly arrived star, Cindy Sheehan and her pals, felony ex-con racist Moslem, Malik Rahim, the rapidly anti-Semitic Hadi Jawad, and the convicted terrorist abettor Lynne Stewart -- this is the same roster as has appeared at every other prior ANSWER rally. Such as at Bush's 2005 inaugural.
But as Corn and others point out, ANSWER is a front for the Communist Workers World Party.
As described by Corn, the WWP is "a small political sect that years ago split from the Socialist Workers Party to support the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956. The party advocates socialist revolution and abolishing private property. It is a fan of Fidel Castros regime in Cuba, and it hails North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il for preserving his countrys 'socialist system.'"
NOVEMBER 1 - 7, 2002Behind the Placards
The odd and troubling origins of todays anti-war movement
by David CornFREE MUMIA. FREE THE CUBAN 5. FREE JAMIL AL-AMIN (thats H. Rap Brown, the former Black Panther convicted in March of killing a sheriffs deputy in 2000). And free Leonard Peltier. Also, defeat Zionism. And, while were at it, lets bring the capitalist system to a halt.When tens of thousands of people gathered near the Vietnam Veterans Memorial for an anti-war rally and march in Washington last Saturday, the demands hurled by the speakers extended far beyond the call for no war against Iraq. Opponents of the war can be heartened by the sight of people coming together in Washington and other cities for pre-emptive protests. But demonstrations such as these are not necessarily strategic advances, for the crowds are still relatively small and, more importantly, the message is designed by the far left for consumption by those already in their choir.
In a telling sign of the organizers priorities, the cause of Mumia Abu-Jamal, the taxi driver/radical journalist sentenced to death two decades ago for killing a policeman, drew greater attention than the idea that revived and unfettered weapons inspections should occur in Iraq before George W. Bush launches a war. Few of the dozens of speakers, if any, bothered suggesting a policy option regarding Saddam Hussein other than a simplistic leave-Iraq-alone. Jesse Jackson may have been the only major figure to acknowledge Saddams brutality, noting that the Iraqi dictator should be held accountable for his crimes. What to do about Iraq? Most speakers had nothing to say about that. Instead, the Washington rally was a pander fest for the hard left.
If public-opinion polls are correct, 33 percent to 40 percent of the public opposes an Iraq war; even more are against a unilateral action. This means the burgeoning anti-war movement has a large recruiting pool, yet the demo was not intended to persuade doubters. Nor did it speak to Americans who oppose the war but who dont consider the United States a force of unequaled imperialist evil and who dont yearn to smash global capitalism.
This was no accident, for the demonstration was essentially organized by the Workers World Party, a small political sect that years ago split from the Socialist Workers Party to support the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956. The party advocates socialist revolution and abolishing private property. It is a fan of Fidel Castros regime in Cuba, and it hails North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il for preserving his countrys socialist system, which, according to the partys newspaper, has kept North Korea from falling under the sway of the transnational banks and corporations that dictate to most of the world. The WWP has campaigned against the war-crimes trial of former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic. A recent Workers World editorial declared, Iraq has done absolutely nothing wrong.
Officially, the organizer of the Washington demonstration was International ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War & End Racism). But ANSWER is run by WWP activists, to such an extent that it seems fair to dub it a WWP front. Several key ANSWER officials including spokesperson Brian Becker are WWP members. Many local offices for ANSWERs protest were housed in WWP offices. Earlier this year, when ANSWER conducted a press briefing, at least five of the 13 speakers were WWP activists. They were each identified, though, in other ways, including as members of the International Action Center.
The IAC, another WWP offshoot, was a key partner with ANSWER in promoting the protest. It was founded by Ramsey Clark, attorney general for President Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s. For years, Clark has been on a bizarre political odyssey, much of the time in sync with the Workers World Party. As an attorney, he has represented Lyndon LaRouche, the leader of a political cult. He has defended Serbian war criminal Radovan Karadzic and Pastor Elizaphan Ntakirutimana, who was accused of participating in the genocide in Rwanda in 1994. Clark is also a member of the International Committee To Defend Slobodan Milosevic. The international war-crimes tribunal, he explains, is war by other means that is, a tool of the West to crush those who stand in the way of U.S. imperialism, like Milosevic. A critic of the ongoing sanctions against Iraq, Clark has appeared on talking-head shows and refused to concede any wrongdoing on Saddams part. There is no reason to send weapons inspectors to Iraq, he told CNNs Wolf Blitzer: After 12 years of brutalization with sanctions and bombing theyd like to be a country again. Theyd like to have sovereignty again. Theyd like to be left alone.
It is not redbaiting to note the WWPs not-too-hidden hand in the nascent anti-war movement. It explains the tone and message of Saturdays rally. Take the question of inspections. According to Workers World
WWP shaped the demonstrations content by loading the speakers list with its own people. None, though, were identified as belonging to the WWP. Larry Holmes, who emceed much of the rally from a stage dominated by ANSWER posters, was introduced as a representative of the ANSWER Steering Committee and the International Action Center. The audience was not told that he is also a member of the secretariat of the Workers World Party. When Leslie Feinberg spoke and accused Bush of concocting a war to cover up the capitalist economic crisis, she informed the crowd that she is a Jewish revolutionary dedicated to the fight against Zionism. When I asked her what groups she worked with, she replied that she was a lesbian-gay-bi-transgender movement activist. Yet a May issue of Workers World describes Feinberg as a lesbian and transgendered communist and a managing editor of Workers World. The WWPs Sara Flounders, who urged the crowd to resist colonial subjugation, was presented as an IAC rep. Shortly after she spoke, Holmes introduced one of the events big-name speakers: Ramsey Clark. He declared that the Bush administration aims to end the idea of individual freedom.
[Excerpted. For the full article, go to Sweetness & Light or to the link above.]
It's a blind squirrel acorn moment for sure, but give David Corn some credit for doing what our "watchdog" media refuses to do: admit that these people are professional Communist agitators.
One of today's listed speakers, Dolores Huerta, left, received the CPUSA's Red Flame Award for outstanding progressive leadership. The awards name is based on the nickname of Anne Burlak Timpson, an outstanding labor organizer and leader of the CPUSA. (From the Peoples Weekly World.)
ANSWER is no grassroots organization. These people are the lickspittle dupes and hirelings of some of the most cut-throat political thugs in the history of mankind.
The guy's a regular investigative reporter. I thought CANSWER was just a bunch-o-peaceniks.
I hate it when people I LOATHE say something so obviously true I have to agree with them.
And by "rapidly anti-Semitic" I meant "rabidly anti-Semtic."
Though, I guess both could apply.
Just checked outside. Thought I heard a pig flying over the house.
They drive a very fast car to the rally?
"How does one become rapidly antisemitic?"
Timing.
But you know, I've even seen typos in the NY Times!
Typo's and outright lies.
Excellent question!
I flicked by CSPAN and the head of ANSWER for young people, or something like that, who was a student at Howard University, said that there were hundred of thousands of youth there. It looked like 1--2 thousand to me.
And by "rabidly anti-Semtic" I meant "rabidly anti-Semitic."
Thought I'd better note that too, since clearly this typo is the most important aspect of the article.
This is the democrat partys core constituents. I'm sure they all voted for Kookcinich in the primary and sKerry in the general.
That was probably Eugene Puryear:
http://tinyurl.com/9h2py
Or it might have been Peta Lindsey
Here is a video of her speaking to the million worker rally a couple of years ago.
http://eserver.org/clogic/2005/Peta_Lindsay.html
Here is a picture of Peta being hugged by friend of Fidel, Hugo Chavez.
http://socialismandliberation.org/mag/index.php?aid=169
"as Corn and others point out, ANSWER is a front for the Communist Workers World Party"
Wow. Stop the presses. This is hugh.
David is just doing a CYA - but it won't change my opinion of him.
You really wonder sometimes why anybody would ever bother to take the time to post real content here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.