Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffers

There was a report last night from the NHC, in the discussion, that mentioned Rita's convection really firing up again after she hit land. She might have been stronger after landfall for awhile than she was before landfall.


903 posted on 09/24/2005 6:06:01 PM PDT by Ingtar (Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies ]


To: Ingtar

That's what I'm wondering. Some of the reports just aren't fitting with others, and a strengthening after landfall helps them fit better. My gut doesn't like that as a solution though, but I'm not really sure why. I do remember the storm seemed to stay at "cat-2" for a long time after landfall, but what feels more likely is some kind of isolated events, like spin-ups around Lufkin, or funneling effects in some places and not others.

The old saw about the simplest solution being the best is one I tend to agree with.


909 posted on 09/24/2005 6:10:48 PM PDT by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 903 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar
There was a report last night from the NHC, in the discussion, that mentioned Rita's convection really firing up again after she hit land.

The eye appears to have intensified just before landfall. Convection increased, too late to increase her winds, but I believe they kept the winds from decreasing when they normally would have.

1,346 posted on 09/24/2005 11:32:54 PM PDT by laz (They can bus 'em to the polls, but they can't bus 'em out of the path of a Cat 5 hurricane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 903 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson