Replies

"HA... you do not know enough to claim inaccuracies, that is what the rest of the Bible is about, explaining what your silly mind calls inaccuracies."

They are very different accounts, as you already admitted. They cannot both be true. Your silly mind not withstanding.

"Somebody told you a hummer. Since the story is about THE Adam his generations and those that his generations came into contact with through the birth of Christ, why would anyone else be under the COVENANT? You an evolutionists want to tell me I make up stuff. HA HA HA HA
"

The Bible doesn't mention any other people. You can't just pull stuff from yer, um, posterior just to fill in Genesis' inaccuracies. If you want to write your own version of Genesis, feel free. Just don't claim it was in the Bible.

"Now to be a priest one had to be a Levi and could only marry another Levi, that says that Mary's was at least partially from the tribe of LEVI on her mother's side. Mary's father was from the tribe of Judah. Mary came from the tribe of Judah and Levi, which is EVIDENCE of her linage to Noah and Adam for that matter."

Or she could be descended from the people you made up before. The imaginary people who were not part of the Covenant. It's so easy for you, you can just make it up as you go.

" I did not add anything to Genesis"

Except your ignoring the fact it says worldwide flood, and your invention of people who survived the Flood along with Noah, in complete disregard for what Genesis says. other than that, you're right. :)

"They are very different accounts, as you already admitted. They cannot both be true. Your silly mind not withstanding."

We are told in two different places about what would happen to those who added and take away from the Word of GOD. Guess you could say they sealed their own fate. I am told out of the recordings of the mouth of Christ let no man (physical or spiritual) deceive me. So considering that would be the attempt DECEPTION I took the time to give a closer look.

One also cannot ignore that Isaiah which Christ quoted said it is not given for all to understand, that is their protection. That being the case, explains full well the "traditions" of man.

NOT my job to unseal what God has sealed. However, it is the evidence that is sealed into my mind that gives me the ability to call evolution a LIE.

"The Bible doesn't mention any other people. You can't just pull stuff from yer, um, posterior just to fill in Genesis' inaccuracies. If you want to write your own version of Genesis, feel free. Just don't claim it was in the Bible."

The biology/DNA does in fact prove there was more than one race that was created in which the Heavenly Father said was GOOD. Only man tries and play primo selection of the different races, sure is not of God. Why isn't cain listed as one of Adam's generations? Where did cain go to find a woman? Oh there are other peoples listed as one traces the footsteps of the generations of The Adam.

"Or she could be descended from the people you made up before. The imaginary people who were not part of the Covenant. It's so easy for you, you can just make it up as you go."

Well now if Christ was to come from the root of Jesse out of King David, logic tells that Mary would have had to have been from at least part of the lineage. What we are told, since Christ was to be the King of Kings and the High Priest, doesn't take a rocket scientists to connect the dots.

"Except your ignoring the fact it says worldwide flood, and your invention of people who survived the Flood along with Noah, in complete disregard for what Genesis says. other than that, you're right. :) "

I do not IGNORE, I take allllllll that is given and based upon the ALLLLLLLLLL given in my limited understand what is now this day as evidence for what was said. I really thought that was a requirement of logic, guess not, guess the evolutionists mind really isn't about logic but rejecting the Heavenly Father and promoting another way.

Now when Christ says that it will be again as it was in the days of Noe, (Noah) do you think He was pointing to another worldwide flood? Would not be possible now considering that Covenant. So that places parameters about what it is that one is to look this day about what the flood was about.

Now considering what old Darwin found on his travels maybe he uncovered a "bottleneck" and sought to use this as his evidence that the Bible was not true.... Now who would then be leading Darwin, surely wasn't the Heavenly Father, now was it. Maybe because the creationists have allowed the traditions of man to decide their doctrine, it was most fitting to allow another way become the doctrine of the establishment.

No where in the WHOLE of God's Word, when men/women were following HIS instruction did God allow another way to take precedence, that should be a signal to the creationists they are NOT following what is actually written.