Replies

" Note what dominion was given to the 6th day creation of men.

What follows is the forming/creation of THE Adam, is completely different that what is described about in the 6th day creation."

Yes I am well aware o the inaccuracies of the Genesis story. Was this supposed to support your case?

"Has nothing to do with my wishes, I do not overlook what appears to be contradictions, that you personally claim as bad plot device."

No, you just make up stuff to cover up the inaccuracy of Genesis. It says that the flood covered the whole Earth and that all men were destroyed except Noah and his Family. The whole point of the Flood story was the very end, when God makes a covenant with Noah and his family. If these other people who also survived the flood in other parts of the world (these made up people from your imagination) were around, they would NOT have anything to do with the Covenant.

"HA Mary had to come from somebody. I do not need show you anything, all that comes from your silly mind is mockery, had you read for yourself you would indeed find Mary's lineage does in fact trace back to Noah. The Heavenly Father needed no flesh man to bring forth His Only Begotten Son."

I know you feel you never need to show evidence, but your feelings are not relevant here. The Bible, despite what some apologists try to claim, doesn't give Mary's genealogy. Both New Testament genealogical versions (Matthew and Luke) are explicitly about Joseph. Problem is, he had nothing to do with Jesus' conception. You said,

" Noah was the continuation of the SEED LINE to CHRIST"

But your additions to Genesis leave open the possibility that Noah was not in the seed line to Christ. Mary might have been one of the descendent's of the people you made up who you claim also survived the Flood. Also, the *SEED* could not have been passed on from the woman's side anyway; it was believed in Jesus' time that only the male produced *seed*.

"What follows is the forming/creation of THE Adam, is completely different that what is described about in the 6th day creation."

Yes I am well aware o the inaccuracies of the Genesis story. Was this supposed to support your case?"

HA... you do not know enough to claim inaccuracies, that is what the rest of the Bible is about, explaining what your silly mind calls inaccuracies.

"No, you just make up stuff to cover up the inaccuracy of Genesis. It says that the flood covered the whole Earth and that all men were destroyed except Noah and his Family. The whole point of the Flood story was the very end, when God makes a covenant with Noah and his family. If these other people who also survived the flood in other parts of the world (these made up people from your imagination) were around, they would NOT have anything to do with the Covenant."

Somebody told you a hummer. Since the story is about THE Adam his generations and those that his generations came into contact with through the birth of Christ, why would anyone else be under the COVENANT? You an evolutionists want to tell me I make up stuff. HA HA HA HA

"I know you feel you never need to show evidence, but your feelings are not relevant here. The Bible, despite what some apologists try to claim, doesn't give Mary's genealogy. Both New Testament genealogical versions (Matthew and Luke) are explicitly about Joseph. Problem is, he had nothing to do with Jesus' conception. You said,"

WRONG!!!! We are told in LUKE that Elizabeth who was the wife of a priest, was related to Mary. Now to be a priest one had to be a Levi and could only marry another Levi, that says that Mary's was at least partially from the tribe of LEVI on her mother's side. Mary's father was from the tribe of Judah. Mary came from the tribe of Judah and Levi, which is EVIDENCE of her linage to Noah and Adam for that matter.

"But your additions to Genesis leave open the possibility that Noah was not in the seed line to Christ. Mary might have been one of the descendent's of the people you made up who you claim also survived the Flood. Also, the *SEED* could not have been passed on from the woman's side anyway; it was believed in Jesus' time that only the male produced *seed*."

I did not add anything to Genesis evolutionists, talk about adding things, you follow another whole religion.

Well now you missed a scripture in Genesis if you think that I am making up about the woman's seed. Genesis 3:15