Very true.
The souless harpy who has this man's dog is keeping it for spite. The more flack she receives the more likely she will be to refuse to return it. Bet on it.
Sadly likely to turn out to be true.
Frankly, I'm with the freeper who wants to see the dog "stolen" and returned to the rightful owner...But maybe the pro bono lawyer, coupled with the bad publicity affecting the harpy's employer, will be successful. If not, then...perhaps...a good samaritan in KC might ...But let's hope lawful measures prevail. Given the whole "Katrina Victim" thing, I really an see a judge voiding the surrender document.
I'm no legal eagle but I'd swear I've heard of contracts being voided if they were signed under duress.
If that wasn't duress, I don't know what would be.
If they can take a kid away from its adoptive parents after they raised it for years when the "birth mother" pops back into the picture, what's the big problem with giving back a dog?
There is always the right way to do things. Nevill has already shown she has no morals and appears that she does not know how to set a good example for her children.
Perhaps the law can work for this man in some way.
As I was reading the comments one thing came to mind, why did the temp digs help out this man and his dog. I mean, we rent property, we put a higher a deposit if they have pets. This does not even fall under that. Had someone come to me, after just losing their home, relocating and now looking for permanent digs I would have found a way to help with his pet. Either giving a pass for the three weeks or seeking out an animal hospital that would offer reduce rates for the stay of Shuma.
Somehow, that needs to be addressed. I think Texas is doing an excellent job when it came to the current hurricane and the evacuation of folks and their pets. It is an important logistical situation and MUST be addressed. I spoke to a family member who was affected by Katrina (lives in Biloxi) and she said that they had a friend die because they remained for the pets.