Skip to comments.
Massachusetts moves ahead sans Microsoft
CNet News.com ^
| 23 September 2005
| Martin LaMonica
Posted on 09/23/2005 8:39:05 PM PDT by ShadowAce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
This is about open standards--not open source.
1
posted on
09/23/2005 8:39:05 PM PDT
by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
2
posted on
09/23/2005 8:39:30 PM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
I hope they are shooting themselves in the foot.
3
posted on
09/23/2005 8:49:40 PM PDT
by
Chicha Kazembe
(Dickinson, TX (Now in Kerrville, TX, just west of San Antonio))
To: ShadowAce
Sounds like the geniuses in MA will wind up paying 10X in consulting fees what they think they are saving in software licenses.
It's easy to thinkg you're abe a genius when you're spending other people's money.
4
posted on
09/23/2005 8:56:37 PM PDT
by
keithtoo
(Howard Dean is a Rove plant, Rove is a NeoCon plant, NeoCons are Trilateralist plants....)
To: Chicha Kazembe
I hope they are shooting themselves in the foot. Why? Why would you want the format (and accessability) of public documents to be controlled by a private company?
5
posted on
09/23/2005 9:00:05 PM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: keithtoo
I don't think Massachusetts should use the editor you used to create this sentence:
It's easy to thinkg you're abe a genius when you're spending other people's money.
6
posted on
09/23/2005 9:00:40 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: ShadowAce
I will say, Adobe PDF files can encase a lot of differing kinds of material. But... they take forever to open. In a strictly business environment, I only use Excel and Word. My brother who builds heliports and has to show graphics, sketches, etc., he uses Adobe as a transmission medium.
7
posted on
09/23/2005 9:00:54 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
To: ShadowAce
If Microsoft doesn't like this move, they can provide support for ODF. I don't see the problem.
8
posted on
09/23/2005 9:01:42 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: keithtoo
Consulting fees for what? This is a document standards motion--not software. If MS would suport the document standard, they are more than welcome to conduct business with the state of MA.
9
posted on
09/23/2005 9:01:45 PM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Before anyone here jumps in as saying MA is endorsing a particular brand of software please not MS has one full year to support an ODF as defined by MA law, if they do they will be considered along with other vendors. the ODF does not have to be the only, or even default MS document format.
<p.
PS everyone remember you're homework..
10
posted on
09/23/2005 9:02:39 PM PDT
by
N3WBI3
(If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
To: ShadowAce
11
posted on
09/23/2005 9:03:13 PM PDT
by
Terpfen
(http://www.pattonhq.com/unknowntext.html)
To: Petronski
If Microsoft doesn't like this move, they can provide support for ODF. I don't see the problem.They will. OpenDocument is just a subset of what MS is up to.
12
posted on
09/23/2005 9:06:10 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: ShadowAce
During the hearing, Kriss said that the state would save significantly by migrating to OpenDocument-based products rather than going with Office 12--on the order of $5 million for OpenDocument versus $50 million for Office 12, including hardware and operating-system upgrade costs. <snicker>
13
posted on
09/23/2005 9:06:54 PM PDT
by
solitas
(So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
To: js1138
If they respond to this move by fully supporting ODF, this entire event is a tempest in a teapot.
14
posted on
09/23/2005 9:07:42 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: solitas
So they will wind up buying both.
15
posted on
09/23/2005 9:09:41 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: Petronski
I use the same one you do Einstein - which is none at all. Typo's are routinely forgiven in forums.
16
posted on
09/23/2005 9:11:06 PM PDT
by
keithtoo
(Howard Dean is a Rove plant, Rove is a NeoCon plant, NeoCons are Trilateralist plants....)
To: Petronski
"If Microsoft doesn't like this move, they can provide support for ODF. I don't see the problem."
and if M$ doesn't want to support ODF Massachusetts is free to use another product.
17
posted on
09/23/2005 9:24:06 PM PDT
by
Syntyr
(From West Houston Galleria/Memorial area! Locked and Loaded)
To: js1138
They will. OpenDocument is just a subset of what MS is up to.As long as MS supports the Standard and not just its derivative.
18
posted on
09/23/2005 9:27:44 PM PDT
by
TechJunkYard
(my other PC is a 9406)
To: TechJunkYard
Yeah but now we have to teach all of the half wits who live and vote here a whole new way of thought.. in this state that will likely take a Century or more
19
posted on
09/23/2005 9:33:12 PM PDT
by
acapesket
(never had a vote count in all my years here)
To: ShadowAce
Personally, I care more about open standards than open source. Open standard allow competition.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson