Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheSpottedOwl
Then we have the people who are obsessed with it. It starts out tame, and eventually progresses to harder stuff. Then they want to reenact what they see. There is the danger.

Indeed. But we are talking about people who are arguably insane. I don't want the issue being decided solely on that basis any more than I want the issue of religious freedom decided on the basis of the existence of people like Jim Jones.

141 posted on 09/25/2005 8:51:40 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

I'm talking about normal people that get caught up in it, as well as serial killers. They are insane, but "normal people" can become damaged by viewing disturbing images.

There has always been hard core pornography, but it was kept hidden from the general population. I don't know about court deciding what is bad and good, because frankly I don't think they could find their rear ends with both hands.


143 posted on 09/25/2005 9:55:39 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl ("President Bush, start building that wall"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson