Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zlala
Her t.v. stations must come out of Pocatello.

I don't think so.

However, Stevens never discussed his weather theories on the air during his time at Channel 6 - an agreement he had with the station management. What the meteorologist chose to do in his off time was his business, said his manager of eight years.

29 posted on 09/23/2005 5:22:43 PM PDT by ActionNewsBill ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ActionNewsBill
Actually my statement is true, they do get news out of Pocatello. My premise is what was flawed. He's taken his message via print news & Internet.
31 posted on 09/23/2005 5:30:20 PM PDT by zlala ("History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." -Dwight D. Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: ActionNewsBill
In regards to the recent bill that you highlighted in the now closed thread, which I have seen, does not prove that this hurricane was 'created by the Russians that was used to wreak havoc on the US economy' as Stevens has pointed out. It does show that, at most, we are looking into ways to 'manipulate weather' like lesson or even reduce a storm, i.e. a hurricane, so that it wouldn't be as destructive as Katrina is. Doesn't mean, like Steven contends, we, or the 'Russians' have the technology to do this yet.

I have seen reports that the US government did try efforts to reduce the power of hurricanes in the past with little success (like seeding them for example).

And him being a meteorologist doesn't hold muster with me either. My local radio talk show host is also a meteorologist and he doesn't believe in this crud. Just because he has the title, doesn't mean he is anymore believable then the next guy. Except to people like Richard C. Hoagland (the guy who talks about faces on Mars, and Hyperdimensional physics creating these 'artificial' hurricanes, who's credentials include to work for NASA and was a science adviser to Walter Cronkite) who eat this stuff up as if they are fact. After all, Coast to Coast isn't exactly a 'reputable' news source to run to.

That being said, believe it or not, I'm a very open minded. Even my favorite punching bag, Richard C. Hoagland, I do sometimes wonder if he is right in some cases (like the idea that NASA 'destroyed' fossilized sea creature in one of the Mars rover pictures. For one thing, to my untrained eye, the pictures he points out, it does look like a fossil. Too late now that NASA destroyed it}. However, that being said, being open minded is not the same as believing everything he, or Stevens says. And right now, his theories are just, WAY out there.
37 posted on 09/24/2005 2:10:01 AM PDT by Simmy2.5 (There are more conspiracies at DU then there are on Coast to Coast AM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson