| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 09/23/2005 8:02:43 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
New Thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1490378/posts |
Posted on 09/23/2005 9:39:06 AM PDT by NautiNurse
so am I. but I think the dye is cast politically on this. Bush should never have "taken the blame" - because now the level of compassion is measured by the size of the check. these two LA cretins request 250 billion, even though they have no idea what to spend it on - so anyone who proposes less is deemed "uncaring" and "miserly". we should have been fighting back against Blanco from the first day.
No, they have determined the western wall wont extend that far west...the Astrodome is full of Houston PD and Fire vehicles.....
Los Angeles Fire, Los Angeles County Fire, Riverside County Fire, Sacramento County Fire were all staged in Dallas....
p.s - the 'ah no' might have looked snippy - I meant to say ahhhhhh, no, :-)
A stalled or slow storm is not a good thing. That's when they gain strength - at least that's what I've heard.
Geraldo trying to pull a Harrigan.
Oddly enough...neither has Carter;)
Please guys - no flame suit on.
Ya think? I just wonder if it's not media/left pressure. People aren't going to go hungry over night. The astrodome empty. right?
I think it was in Beaumont they said they had moved all their prisoners out before the storm so they had 450 beds or something all ready for anybody that wanted to get in trouble.
Maybe so - I just remember that the big issue was they had no supplies for the ones there.
I agree with you. Bush should not have taken the blame on Katrina. He is too passive. I'd like to see him start fighting back. In fact, I wish he had poked that obnoxious David Gregory in the nose.
Do you have to place a Lone Star Beer in their hand??
If you leave them on their back, beside the road, it is a requirement.
See? Proof that I grew up in Texas.... I knew the answer! : )
"decreases below 60m"
should actually intimate: water depth less than 60m. What I mean by this, the storm should maintain intensity at FL and increase its surface/FL ratio (e.g. from my advocated 0.73, progressively and incremently with respect to time, to the NHC's 0.91 limit - according to the definition of limit understood by those having comprehension of calculus), until the water depth becomes less than 60m.
Looking for working links to the following for the next "phase" of this:
Please post here and they will get put in the update.
F. 151 DEG 121 KT
Do you recall what the last readings were? I remember winds less than 121K . . . I think.
Shep thinks Port Arthur won't flood according to Geraldo. WTF? I thought they were going to bear a major brunt of the storm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.