Posted on 09/23/2005 8:36:07 AM PDT by YaYa123
That is an excellent statement by Senator Lindsey Graham.
we shall see.....until then
SCOTUS isn't his element. He's a trial attorney and a showman, not a behind-the-scenes scholar. If he can't be president, he wants to be governor of South Carolina, where he can draw the media and crowds.
This is a vintage Lindsey Graham closing argument. I've heard him do it in court to great effect. He disarms his opponents, makes them feel at ease,then proceeds to eviscerate their points and leaves only his own standing. He's the best I have ever witnessed at it.
I don't know how many FReepers know it, but Lindsey is already a judge. He is reserve Air Force colonel assigned as a back-up judge on the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals. I think that probably about as much judging as he's ever going to want to do. That's my guess anyway.
If the Dems dare filabuster the next nominee..Graham will be the one leading the charge for the nuclear option..
forgive the lack of caps but i'm typing in the dark while watching the rita news....
good speech...after all he is a politician, but i dont trust him after he joined mcblame and the gang of 14. mr bush's next pick will be to the right of roberts (i hope)lets see how Mr. Graham does when the going gets tough.
I doubt he will vote nuclear, perhaps?
bttt
I did not see Grahm's speech live. Thank you for posting it, I agree that it was superb. Everyone needs to read this in it's entirety. Should also be posted in all govenment classes.
Just did.
Outstanding!
Thanks.
After I read the speech I went over to http://www.c-span.org/ to listen to it via RealPlayer. Two things I noticed; he did not read it, and Kennedy got up and left during the 10 minute speech. Leahy had approached Kennedy, probably to make sure he had his proxy vote correct. I'm going back to see what my guy, Jeff Sessions, had to say.
Sen. Sessions also gave emotional and compelling remarks that he did not read.
I fail to see the humor.
A little earlier in the speech, he noted that he was holding Thurmond's seat. What does that tell you about lifetime?
The votes of most members of both parties are accomodated when necessary. The member's constituency is a factor, the position of the member's local media, the safeness of the seat......or it could be a number of other Machiavellian things like behind-the-scenes vote trading on pork issues.
There were NO surprises on this Roberts vote. None, nada. Only, perhaps, to a portion of the public.
This MO, unfortunately, destroys many illusions and idealism concerning the Senate. But, remember, The U.S. House of Lords is the most exclusive club in the world......and the members consistently do what members in a lot of private clubs do.....promote their own business (in this case, political) interests.
Leni
I respectfully disagree, and to prove Graham knows exactly how the Senate works, please read what he said about the Democrats.
"... we're already talking about the next nominee in code. Senator Kohl, who voted yes, is talking about the balance of the court with O'Connor. Senator Feingold has mentioned he may not be too receptive to Justice Brown..."
"It is not easy for you, Russ. I know you are a prominent player in the Democratic Party. This is not easy for Senator Leahy. It is not easy for Senator Kohl. It will not be easy for those who choose to side with Roberts because they're trying to drive down the vote numbers because of the next person to come. "
"Politics is rearing its head like it has not done before.."
No doubt in my mind Lindsey Graham "gets it".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.