Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/22/2005 6:12:31 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

Bump!


2 posted on 09/22/2005 6:26:51 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Since our media now belongs to the world, it has no right to any knowledge about our business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli

If you went to law school, you'd know why there are so many lib lawyers out there. Think college was bad? The professors in law school make college profs look like conservatives (or in the context of law- originalists. "Is the Constitution a living, breathing document?" was the first rhetorical question posed in Con law class.

The sad thing is, a lot of college kids come out of our colleges with that "mind of mush" mindset and eat it up. The funny thing is, the originalist part came to me so naturally and the split among classmates between originalist interpreters and progressive interpreters was on ideological lines.

Of course I used to write my essays like a Marxist, pretty much disregarding the law and writing from a "liberal heart", as I wanted a decent grade and law school has "blind grading."


3 posted on 09/22/2005 6:31:16 PM PDT by chet_in_ny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli

So-called liberals want our constitution replaced by Das Kapital. The rest of their argumentation is just so much wind.


4 posted on 09/22/2005 6:32:28 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli

An 'Originalist' believes that there is one, and only one, way fot the Constitution to be changed; that the one way is through the ammendment process spelled out in the Constitution itself; and that once ammended in accordance with those procedures, those ammendments become as binding as the 'original' Constitution.

An originalist does not believe that the Constitution is a 'living' document that is changed by the ebb and flow of either public opinion or judicial appointment.

Thus, an originalist believes people of all races, creeds, colors, and genders are afforded the same rights because the original document has been properly ammended to say so. An originalist does NOT believe that emminent domain can be used to take your property and give it to another.

For example.


5 posted on 09/22/2005 6:36:25 PM PDT by No Longer Free State (Saddam Hussein harbored and paid terrorists. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli

wuli, Mark has a freeper tagline; he is:

holdonnow

so go ahead and send him this very interesting note.


9 posted on 09/22/2005 6:53:28 PM PDT by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli
I laughed out loud the moment I heard "Ari" cite the 3/5ths compromise in the Constitution as evidence of the bigotry of our Founding Fathers.

Al Gore made such an idiotic contention in one of his public utterances several years ago.

If ignorance is bliss, these ignoramuses must be ecstatic.
13 posted on 09/22/2005 7:09:34 PM PDT by Morose Musician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli
I just think it was mighty accommodating of Judge Roberts to let his wife out of her cage to come down to watch him during the hearings.

Seriously, would a guy whose wife has the following CV really want to limit her rights to EQUAL (not superior) RIGHTS??



Ms. Roberts is co-leader of the firm’s professional development and training program and she is a member of Pillsbury University, which provides professional development opportunities through curriculum of core and specialty programs for lawyers and staff. Ms. Roberts is leading the effort to develop practice milestones for attorneys at various stages of their careers.

Before assuming this role in 2003, Ms. Roberts was a partner in the firm’s Global Technology Group focusing on IT sourcing and procurement of satellite systems. Ms. Roberts practice concentrated in representing clients in sophisticated transactions involving technology. Ms. Roberts has extensive experience in representing clients in the buying and selling of space-related goods and services, including companies involved in the development of multi-billion dollar global and regional satellite systems. Ms. Roberts’ experience also includes representing clients in outsourcing transactions; software licensing, development, and maintenance contracts; and professional services arrangements.

Prior to 1992, Ms. Roberts practiced litigation at Shaw Pittman in a wide variety of matters before various courts and decision-making bodies, including large international commercial arbitrations involving nuclear power plants before the International Chamber of Commerce. In 1992, Ms. Roberts litigated before Australian courts with then Arthur Robinson & Hedderwicks, a leading law firm in Australia.

Education J.D., Georgetown University Law Center, 1984 cum laude M.S., Brown University, 1981 Dip. Ed., Melbourne University, 1977 A.B., College Of The Holy Cross, 1976 Magna Cum Laude Affiliations Admitted to practice: District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Virginia Admitted in: U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth and Eleventh Circuits Member of: American Bar Association, District of Columbia Bar Association, Virginia Bar Association, Society of Satellite Professionals, International Professional Development Consortium, Board of Trustees of the College of the Holy Cross External Publications Unsponsored Financed Entrepreneurial Satellite Ventures: Managing Completion Risk, Satellite Finance, Issue 16, 12-Aug-1996
18 posted on 09/22/2005 7:50:56 PM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson