Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/22/2005 4:31:21 PM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Crackingham
The mainstream media also knows that every single time the question of same-sex marriage has been submitted directly to the voters, it has been overwhelming rejected.

IIRC rejected by 11 states in the 2004 election, and a few were even states won by Kerry.

2 posted on 09/22/2005 4:38:57 PM PDT by perfect stranger ("Hell Bent for Election" by Warburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
There isn't an honest journalist in the country who would deny that those are interesting questions which would generate news no matter how Senator Clinton or Senator Reid or Schumer answered. That they haven't been asked--by any reporter in any venue of any big-name Democrat--speaks volume about the mainstream media's bias and its adjunct status to the Democratic party. -Hugh Hewitt

We need to hold big media's feet to the fire. Don't just dismiss them as a lost cause. Russert et al: Ask national Democrats where they stand on the California Democratic legislature's attempted end-run around the voters. Was the Governor correct to veto it?.

3 posted on 09/22/2005 4:43:29 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

****The bill proposed changing the legal definition of marriage from "a civil contract between a man and a woman" to a "civil contract between two persons." ******

I guess that means you could marry your mother or your sister. Or your father if he was queer. Be pretty nice to have the Fathers pension passed on to his daughter.


5 posted on 09/22/2005 6:10:29 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson